Awkward-Output
0x66f60955cf8a40ebef9e73cde12212a6de87bcd8
Wallet digest
Activity score
45/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
3
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-52.23
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Fed end QT before May?$19.43Mar 16, 10:15 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Fed end QT before May?$0.05Mar 16, 09:57 UTC
- TRADEBUYAustralian Open Final (W): Sabalenka vs. Keys$27.75Jan 25, 10:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYAustralian Open: Sinner vs. Shelton$5.00Jan 24, 09:21 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Trump create Bitcoin reserve in first 100 days?$37.25Jan 24, 04:29 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Trump create Bitcoin reserve in first 100 days?$28.87Jan 23, 15:39 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Trump create Bitcoin reserve in first 100 days?$28.87Jan 23, 15:38 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Trump create Bitcoin reserve in first 100 days?$25.07Jan 21, 15:04 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 8
- Avg trade size
- $21.54
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Jan 21, 15:04 UTC
- Last active
- Mar 16, 10:15 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".