Frugal-Savage
0x678b9bdd6b6cbc2789358414d80ee51365abbeaf
Wallet digest
Activity score
43/100
Performance measurable
Open positions
37
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-19.6K
Realised
$-967.29
Win rate
33%
9 closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 37- OVER
Nottingham Forest FC vs. Arsenal FC: O/U 2.5
8092 shares @ 47.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 17, 2026$0.00
$-3.8K
- OVER
Arsenal FC vs. Liverpool FC: O/U 1.5
6522 shares @ 46.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 8, 2026$0.00
$-3.0K
- OVER
Crystal Palace FC vs. Aston Villa FC: O/U 1.5
5341 shares @ 46.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 7, 2026$0.00
$-2.5K
- YES
Will Arsenal FC win on 2026-01-17?
2644 shares @ 61.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 17, 2026$0.00
$-1.6K
- YES
Will Real Madrid CF win on 2026-01-14?
2012 shares @ 72.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 14, 2026$0.00
$-1.4K
- OVER
Hamburger SV vs. Borussia Mönchengladbach: O/U 2.5
1764 shares @ 56.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 17, 2026$0.00
$-1000.00
- ALCARAZ
ATP World Tour Finals, Final Stage: Carlos Alcaraz vs Jannik Sinner
1465 shares @ 29.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 23, 2025$0.00
$-430.75
- YES
Will Manchester City FC win on 2026-01-17?
1429 shares @ 50.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 17, 2026$0.00
$-714.34
- OVER
TSG 1899 Hoffenheim vs. Bayer 04 Leverkusen: O/U 2.5
1077 shares @ 65.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 17, 2026$0.00
$-699.99
- OVER
Arsenal FC vs. Liverpool FC: O/U 3.5
763 shares @ 32.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 8, 2026$0.00
$-243.95
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Arsenal FC win on 2026-01-17?$475.35Jan 17, 17:50 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Racing Club de Lens win on 2026-01-17?$475.35Jan 17, 17:49 UTC
- TRADEBUYNottingham Forest FC vs. Arsenal FC: O/U 2.5$63.85Jan 17, 17:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYNottingham Forest FC vs. Arsenal FC: O/U 2.5$371.15Jan 17, 17:42 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Racing Club de Lens win on 2026-01-17?$435.00Jan 17, 17:41 UTC
- TRADEBUYNottingham Forest FC vs. Arsenal FC: O/U 2.5$449.03Jan 17, 17:26 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Racing Club de Lens win on 2026-01-17?$449.03Jan 17, 17:26 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Arsenal FC win on 2026-01-17?$753.16Jan 17, 17:00 UTC
- TRADEBUYNottingham Forest FC vs. Arsenal FC: O/U 2.5$55.42Jan 17, 16:59 UTC
- TRADEBUYNottingham Forest FC vs. Arsenal FC: O/U 2.5$17.78Jan 17, 16:58 UTC
- TRADEBUYNottingham Forest FC vs. Arsenal FC: O/U 2.5$2.40Jan 17, 16:58 UTC
- TRADEBUYNottingham Forest FC vs. Arsenal FC: O/U 2.5$0.92Jan 17, 16:58 UTC
- TRADEBUYNottingham Forest FC vs. Arsenal FC: O/U 2.5$6.72Jan 17, 16:58 UTC
- TRADEBUYNottingham Forest FC vs. Arsenal FC: O/U 2.5$16.54Jan 17, 16:58 UTC
- TRADEBUYNottingham Forest FC vs. Arsenal FC: O/U 2.5$25.40Jan 17, 16:58 UTC
- TRADEBUYNottingham Forest FC vs. Arsenal FC: O/U 2.5$4.98Jan 17, 16:58 UTC
- TRADEBUYNottingham Forest FC vs. Arsenal FC: O/U 2.5$36.29Jan 17, 16:57 UTC
- TRADEBUYNottingham Forest FC vs. Arsenal FC: O/U 2.5$7.32Jan 17, 16:57 UTC
- TRADEBUYNottingham Forest FC vs. Arsenal FC: O/U 2.5$5.16Jan 17, 16:57 UTC
- TRADEBUYNottingham Forest FC vs. Arsenal FC: O/U 2.5$51.84Jan 17, 16:57 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 50
- Avg trade size
- $259.58
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Jan 17, 14:34 UTC
- Last active
- Jan 17, 17:50 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 9 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".