Married-Silence
0x682aa9db7d9c7701cb139d5e7ac4d45e324e4b62
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
35
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-92.83
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 35- YES
Will Tottenham win on 2025-02-26?
227 shares @ 1.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 26, 2025$0.00
$-2.27
- YES
Will Benfica win on 2025-03-11?
100 shares @ 1.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 11, 2025$0.00
$-1.00
- YES
Will Liverpool win on 2025-03-11?
100 shares @ 1.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 11, 2025$0.00
$-1.00
- YES
Will Liverpool vs. Newcastle end in a draw?
100 shares @ 1.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 26, 2025$0.00
$-1.00
- YES
Will Inter Milan win the Serie A?
95 shares @ 7.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 25, 2025$0.00
$-6.80
- YES
Will Fenerbahce win on 2025-03-06?
75 shares @ 1.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 6, 2025$0.00
$-0.75
- YES
Will Borussia Dortmund win on 2025-02-19?
50 shares @ 1.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 19, 2025$0.00
$-0.50
- YES
Will Feyenoord win on 2025-03-11?
50 shares @ 1.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 11, 2025$0.00
$-0.50
- TOTTENHAM
FA Cup: Aston Villa vs. Tottenham (To Advance)
48 shares @ 1.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 9, 2025$0.00
$-0.48
- YES
Will Galatasaray SK win on 2026-01-28?
40 shares @ 7.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 28, 2026$0.00
$-2.80
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Galatasaray SK win on 2026-01-28?$2.80Jan 28, 18:02 UTC
- TRADEBUYGalatasaray SK vs. Club Atlético de Madrid: O/U 3.5$2.34Jan 21, 14:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Galatasaray SK win on 2026-01-21?$3.00Jan 21, 14:44 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - December 4, 7:00PM-7:15PM ET$5.00Jan 21, 14:43 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - December 4, 7:00PM-7:15PM ET$2.45Dec 4, 23:57 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - December 4, 6:45PM-7:00PM ET$0.98Dec 4, 23:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - December 4, 6:45PM-7:00PM ET$1.47Dec 4, 23:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - December 4, 6:30PM-6:45PM ET$2.45Dec 4, 23:29 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - December 4, 6:15PM-6:30PM ET$2.45Dec 4, 23:15 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - December 4, 6:00PM-6:15PM ET$2.45Dec 4, 22:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - December 4, 5:45PM-6:00PM ET$2.45Dec 4, 22:38 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - December 4, 5:15PM-5:30PM ET$2.45Dec 4, 21:51 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - December 4, 4:00PM-4:15PM ET$10.00Dec 4, 21:43 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - December 4, 4:00PM-4:15PM ET$2.75Dec 4, 21:05 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - December 4, 4:00PM-4:15PM ET$2.80Dec 4, 21:05 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - December 4, 4:00PM-4:15PM ET$2.15Dec 4, 21:00 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - December 4, 4:00PM-4:15PM ET$2.20Dec 4, 21:00 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - December 4, 3:15PM-3:30PM ET$5.00Dec 4, 20:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - December 4, 3:15PM-3:30PM ET$2.40Dec 4, 20:16 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - December 4, 3:15PM-3:30PM ET$2.50Dec 4, 20:06 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 46
- Avg trade size
- $2.60
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Mar 1, 19:25 UTC
- Last active
- Jan 28, 18:02 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".