Bronze-Role
0x686e1016f7f7dc3fb8f49e7ea23c1367b828af8c
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
50
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-7.6K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 50- YES
Fed decreases interest rates by 50+ bps after December 2025 meeting?
33333 shares @ 0.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 10, 2025$0.00
$-100.00
- YES
Fed decreases interest rates by 50+ bps after June 2025 meeting?
25000 shares @ 0.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jun 18, 2025$0.00
$-50.00
- YES
Fed decreases interest rates by 25 bps after June 2025 meeting?
10706 shares @ 0.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jun 18, 2025$0.00
$-99.99
- NO
TikTok banned in the US before May 2025?
7028 shares @ 2.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 30, 2025$0.00
$-205.88
- YES
Fed decreases interest rates by 25 bps after May 2025 meeting?
6158 shares @ 2.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 7, 2025$0.00
$-123.15
- YES
Fed decreases interest rates by 50+ bps after September 2025 meeting?
2814 shares @ 7.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Sep 17, 2025$0.00
$-199.80
- YES
Will Inter win on 2025-05-31?
2244 shares @ 8.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 31, 2025$0.00
$-199.42
- YES
Will Arsenal win on 2025-05-07?
1984 shares @ 25.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 7, 2025$0.00
$-498.89
- YES
Will Fulham win on 2025-05-03?
1584 shares @ 15.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 3, 2025$0.00
$-249.25
- YES
Will Arsenal win on 2025-04-29?
1467 shares @ 34.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 29, 2025$0.00
$-500.00
Recent activity
- REDEEMWill Eintracht Frankfurt win on 2025-09-18?$0.18Dec 10, 19:26 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Real Madrid CF win on 2025-12-10?$100.00Dec 10, 19:25 UTC
- TRADEBUYFed decreases interest rates by 50+ bps after December 2025 meeting?$100.00Dec 10, 18:23 UTC
- REDEEMCentral Michigan vs. Akron$347.73Oct 5, 03:10 UTC
- TRADEBUYCentral Michigan vs. Akron$151.00Oct 4, 21:02 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill AJ Auxerre vs. Racing Club de Lens end in a draw?$200.00Oct 4, 20:41 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Atalanta win on 2025-10-04?$150.00Oct 4, 19:05 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Real Madrid vs. Villarreal end in a draw?$150.00Oct 4, 18:45 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Chelsea win on 2025-10-04?$651.00Oct 4, 18:43 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Chelsea win on 2025-10-04?$149.88Oct 4, 18:03 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Everton win on 2025-09-29?$68.91Sep 29, 20:37 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Hamburger SV win on 2025-09-28?$121.28Sep 28, 17:38 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Arsenal win on 2025-09-28?$121.28Sep 28, 17:37 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Arsenal win on 2025-09-28?$29.40Sep 28, 16:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Arsenal win on 2025-09-21?$147.75Sep 21, 15:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Manchester United vs. Chelsea end in a draw?$45.55Sep 20, 17:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Chelsea win on 2025-09-20?$135.38Sep 20, 16:41 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill 1. FC Köln win on 2025-09-20?$149.92Sep 20, 16:30 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Nottingham Forest win on 2025-09-20?$154.72Sep 20, 14:40 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Real Madrid vs. Espanyol end in a draw?$145.00Sep 20, 14:38 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 46
- Avg trade size
- $144.74
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 10, 14:16 UTC
- Last active
- Dec 10, 19:26 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".