Recent-Piccolo
0x694dd3c8b257e60b0c298a82b7fd57adcb53dce7
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
16
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-2.0K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 16- YES
Will a contestant numbered 176 - 200 win Beast Games: Season 2?
4912 shares @ 18.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 25, 2026$0.00
$-890.66
- YES
Will Player 191 win Beast Games: Season 2?
3598 shares @ 17.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 25, 2026$0.00
$-618.99
- YES
Will Player 42 win Beast Games: Season 2?
3178 shares @ 0.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 25, 2026$0.00
$-19.99
- YES
Will Player 831 win Beast Games: Season 2?
3008 shares @ 0.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 25, 2026$0.00
$-20.00
- YES
Will Player 118 win Beast Games: Season 2?
2956 shares @ 1.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 25, 2026$0.00
$-35.00
- YES
Will Player 148 win Beast Games: Season 2?
2264 shares @ 0.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 25, 2026$0.00
$-13.00
- YES
Will Player 58 win Beast Games: Season 2?
1870 shares @ 3.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 25, 2026$0.00
$-70.00
- YES
Will Player 162 win Beast Games: Season 2?
1777 shares @ 0.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 25, 2026$0.00
$-12.00
- YES
Will Player 173 win Beast Games: Season 2?
1692 shares @ 1.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 25, 2026$0.00
$-20.00
- YES
Will Player 38 win Beast Games: Season 2?
1569 shares @ 2.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 25, 2026$0.00
$-33.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Player 148 win Beast Games: Season 2?$3.00Jan 16, 07:38 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Player 118 win Beast Games: Season 2?$5.00Jan 16, 07:37 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Player 831 win Beast Games: Season 2?$20.00Jan 16, 07:07 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Player 118 win Beast Games: Season 2?$10.00Jan 16, 07:06 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Player 148 win Beast Games: Season 2?$10.00Jan 16, 07:05 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Player 191 win Beast Games: Season 2?$20.00Jan 16, 07:01 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Player 38 win Beast Games: Season 2?$3.00Jan 16, 07:00 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Player 566 win Beast Games: Season 2?$30.00Jan 16, 06:53 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Player 58 win Beast Games: Season 2?$20.00Jan 16, 06:49 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Player 195 win Beast Games: Season 2?$20.00Jan 16, 06:48 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Player 21 win Beast Games: Season 2?$5.00Jan 14, 07:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Player 173 win Beast Games: Season 2?$20.00Jan 14, 07:32 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Player 42 win Beast Games: Season 2?$8.00Jan 14, 07:30 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Player 162 win Beast Games: Season 2?$12.00Jan 14, 06:46 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Player 952 win Beast Games: Season 2?$3.00Jan 14, 06:40 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Player 42 win Beast Games: Season 2?$12.00Jan 14, 06:38 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Player 118 win Beast Games: Season 2?$20.00Jan 14, 06:28 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Player 99 win Beast Games: Season 2?$40.00Jan 14, 06:25 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Player 38 win Beast Games: Season 2?$30.00Jan 14, 06:24 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Player 195 win Beast Games: Season 2?$20.00Jan 14, 06:22 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 30
- Avg trade size
- $68.02
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Jan 8, 04:22 UTC
- Last active
- Jan 16, 07:38 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".