Gorgeous-Sign
0x6bf2b7f79dc45e5659f03ab86026900240316a11
Wallet digest
Activity score
37/100
Performance measurable
Open positions
51
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-3.2K
Realised
$-919.82
Win rate
17%
35 closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 51- MOUZ
Counter-Strike: MOUZ vs Team Falcons - Map 1 Winner
2585 shares @ 2.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 6, 2025$0.00
$-73.55
- TEAM FALCONS
Counter-Strike: MOUZ vs Team Falcons (BO3)
993 shares @ 31.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 6, 2025$0.00
$-315.97
- PAIN
Counter-Strike: B8 vs paiN - Map 1 Winner
642 shares @ 45.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 6, 2025$0.00
$-292.91
- NATUS VINCERE
Counter-Strike: Natus Vincere vs Vitality (BO3)
490 shares @ 20.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 6, 2025$0.00
$-100.29
- NATUS VINCERE
Counter-Strike: Natus Vincere vs Vitality - Map 1 Winner
340 shares @ 15.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 6, 2025$0.00
$-52.97
- G2
Counter-Strike: G2 vs TheMongolz - Map 2 Winner
337 shares @ 22.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 6, 2025$0.00
$-73.97
- 3DMAX
Counter-Strike: 3DMAX vs FaZe - Map 2 Winner
311 shares @ 30.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 6, 2025$0.00
$-95.43
- AMARU GAMING
Dota 2: Tundra Esports vs Amaru Gaming - Game 2 Winner
294 shares @ 6.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 10, 2025$0.00
$-19.00
- UNDER
Games Total: O/U 2.5
283 shares @ 21.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 6, 2025$0.00
$-61.03
- 3DMAX
Counter-Strike: 3DMAX vs FaZe - Map 1 Winner
274 shares @ 14.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 6, 2025$0.00
$-39.38
Recent activity
- REDEEMDota 2: Team Tidebound vs Virtus.pro (BO3)$9.89Dec 15, 09:46 UTC
- REDEEMDota 2: Team Tidebound vs Virtus.pro - Game 2 Winner$18.43Dec 15, 09:46 UTC
- TRADESELLDota 2: Aurora vs 1win - Game 2 Winner$0.77Dec 11, 13:03 UTC
- TRADESELLDota 2: Team Spirit vs Natus Vincere - Game 2 Winner$0.13Dec 11, 13:02 UTC
- TRADESELLDota 2: Team Tidebound vs Virtus.pro (BO3)$1.62Dec 11, 13:02 UTC
- TRADESELLDota 2: Aurora vs 1win (BO3)$1.63Dec 11, 13:02 UTC
- TRADESELLDota 2: Team Spirit vs Natus Vincere (BO3)$3.77Dec 11, 13:02 UTC
- TRADESELLDota 2: MOUZ vs Team Falcons (BO3)$8.18Dec 11, 13:02 UTC
- TRADESELLDota 2: Aurora vs 1win (BO3)$25.74Dec 11, 13:02 UTC
- TRADESELLDota 2: Aurora vs 1win - Game 1 Winner$9.35Dec 11, 13:02 UTC
- TRADESELLDota 2: Team Spirit vs Natus Vincere - Game 2 Winner$19.32Dec 11, 13:02 UTC
- TRADESELLDota 2: MOUZ vs Team Falcons - Game 2 Winner$22.57Dec 11, 13:01 UTC
- TRADESELLDota 2: MOUZ vs Team Falcons - Game 2 Winner$15.29Dec 11, 12:59 UTC
- TRADEBUYDota 2: MOUZ vs Team Falcons - Game 2 Winner$8.21Dec 11, 12:57 UTC
- TRADEBUYDota 2: MOUZ vs Team Falcons - Game 2 Winner$8.71Dec 11, 12:57 UTC
- TRADEBUYDota 2: Aurora vs 1win (BO3)$4.85Dec 11, 12:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYDota 2: Team Spirit vs Natus Vincere (BO3)$1.78Dec 11, 12:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYDota 2: Aurora vs 1win (BO3)$3.43Dec 11, 12:56 UTC
- TRADESELLDota 2: Aurora vs 1win (BO3)$11.46Dec 11, 12:56 UTC
- TRADESELLDota 2: MOUZ vs Team Falcons - Game 2 Winner$0.05Dec 11, 12:55 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 48
- Avg trade size
- $5.95
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Dec 11, 12:40 UTC
- Last active
- Dec 15, 09:46 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 35 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".