Wide-Eyed-Efficiency
0x6d336d5b818b77c867948c2ddea370129c6ff0ef
Wallet digest
Activity score
43/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
1
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-213.97
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Recent activity
- REDEEMWill Amazon (AMZN) close above $255 on May 28?$30.03May 29, 07:30 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Amazon (AMZN) close above $255 on May 28?$30.00May 28, 11:28 UTC
- REDEEMWill SpaceX IPO by March 31, 2026?$11.11Apr 26, 13:42 UTC
- MAKER_REBATE$2.58Apr 8, 01:02 UTC
- TRADEBUYHyperliquid Up or Down - April 7, 4:00AM-8:00AM ET$213.97Apr 7, 09:25 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill SpaceX IPO by March 31, 2026?$11.00Mar 22, 09:58 UTC
- TRADESELLWill NVIDIA be the third-largest company in the world by market cap on March 31?$1.5KMar 22, 09:53 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill NVIDIA be the third-largest company in the world by market cap on March 31?$1.5KMar 22, 09:29 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 5
- Avg trade size
- $655.78
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Mar 22, 09:29 UTC
- Last active
- May 29, 07:30 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".