Educated-Consent
0x6d3cb87bbdef0f6ffc1a297619e4231d346220e7
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
13
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-3.0K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 13- OVER
AEK vs. NK Celje: O/U 2.5
1364 shares @ 88.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 19, 2026$0.00
$-1.2K
- OVER
CD Nacional vs. Estoril Praia: O/U 1.5
556 shares @ 90.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 15, 2026$0.00
$-500.00
- OVER
US Sassuolo Calcio vs. Bologna FC 1909: O/U 1.5
450 shares @ 89.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 15, 2026$0.00
$-400.00
- OVER
Dinamo 1948 vs. Universitatea Craiova CS: O/U 1.5
359 shares @ 83.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 19, 2026$0.00
$-300.00
- OVER
Dundee United FC vs. Celtic FC: O/U 2.5
250 shares @ 40.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 22, 2026$0.00
$-100.00
- OVER
Bologna FC 1909 vs. Hellas Verona FC: O/U 3.5
200 shares @ 50.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 8, 2026$0.00
$-100.00
- YES
US Sassuolo Calcio vs. Bologna FC 1909: Both Teams to Score
133 shares @ 75.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 15, 2026$0.00
$-100.00
- OVER
Tala'ea El Gaish SC vs. El Ahly SC: O/U 3.5
128 shares @ 77.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 9, 2026$0.00
$-100.00
- OVER
Real Madrid CF vs. Manchester City FC: O/U 3.5
115 shares @ 87.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 11, 2026$0.00
$-100.00
- YES
Will Wuhan San Zhen FC vs. Dalian Yingbo FC end in a draw?
74 shares @ 27.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 13, 2026$0.00
$-20.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYTürkiye vs. Romania: O/U 1.5$10.00Mar 26, 18:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYTürkiye vs. Romania: O/U 1.5$40.00Mar 26, 18:13 UTC
- TRADESELLTottenham Hotspur FC vs. Nottingham Forest FC: O/U 1.5$48.73Mar 22, 15:40 UTC
- TRADEBUYTottenham Hotspur FC vs. Nottingham Forest FC: O/U 1.5$40.00Mar 22, 15:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYDundee United FC vs. Celtic FC: O/U 2.5$100.00Mar 22, 14:10 UTC
- TRADESELLBV Borussia 09 Dortmund vs. Hamburger SV: Both Teams to Score$113.79Mar 21, 19:03 UTC
- TRADEBUYBV Borussia 09 Dortmund vs. Hamburger SV: Both Teams to Score$100.00Mar 21, 18:01 UTC
- TRADEBUYFalkirk FC vs. St Mirren FC: O/U 3.5$20.00Mar 21, 16:32 UTC
- TRADESELLFulham FC vs. Burnley FC: O/U 1.5$135.61Mar 21, 16:28 UTC
- TRADEBUYFulham FC vs. Burnley FC: O/U 1.5$100.00Mar 21, 16:22 UTC
- TRADESELLQingdao Hainiu FC vs. Zhejiang Zhiye FC: Both Teams to Score$112.44Mar 20, 12:52 UTC
- TRADEBUYQingdao Hainiu FC vs. Zhejiang Zhiye FC: Both Teams to Score$100.00Mar 20, 11:49 UTC
- TRADEBUYDinamo 1948 vs. Universitatea Craiova CS: O/U 1.5$300.00Mar 19, 19:40 UTC
- TRADEBUYAEK vs. NK Celje: O/U 2.5$200.00Mar 19, 18:41 UTC
- TRADEBUYAEK vs. NK Celje: O/U 2.5$1000.00Mar 19, 18:38 UTC
- TRADESELLManchester City FC vs. Real Madrid CF: O/U 2.5$232.32Mar 17, 21:59 UTC
- TRADEBUYManchester City FC vs. Real Madrid CF: O/U 2.5$200.00Mar 17, 21:12 UTC
- TRADESELLSporting CP vs. FK Bodø/Glimt: O/U 2.5$398.96Mar 17, 19:22 UTC
- TRADEBUYSporting CP vs. FK Bodø/Glimt: O/U 2.5$300.00Mar 17, 19:11 UTC
- TRADESELLReal Betis Balompié vs. RC Celta de Vigo: O/U 1.5$742.50Mar 15, 18:42 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 48
- Avg trade size
- $287.66
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Mar 13, 11:39 UTC
- Last active
- Mar 26, 18:34 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".