Welcome-Operation
0x6d7ae1b62343f9bb9c97d7c6c07b49e7ff16b172
Wallet digest
Activity score
74/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
3
Open notional
$441.15
Total PnL
$-51.85
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- NO
Bill Belichick engaged in 2025?
441 shares @ 56.7¢·now 100.0¢·exp Dec 31, 2025$441.15
$191.15
- YES
Will MicroStrategy be forced to liquidate Bitcoin holdings in 2025?
900 shares @ 10.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 31, 2025$0.00
$-90.00
- YES
MicroStrategy sells any Bitcoin in 2025?
900 shares @ 17.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 31, 2025$0.00
$-153.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill MicroStrategy be forced to liquidate Bitcoin holdings in 2025?$90.00Mar 14, 11:05 UTC
- TRADEBUYMicroStrategy sells any Bitcoin in 2025?$153.00Mar 14, 10:59 UTC
- TRADEBUYBill Belichick engaged in 2025?$250.00Mar 14, 10:09 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 3
- Avg trade size
- $164.33
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Mar 14, 10:09 UTC
- Last active
- Mar 14, 11:05 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".