Dishonest-Meatloaf
0x6d959083b415a6fc210cbc2774e78151da4074c1
Wallet digest
Activity score
43/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
1
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-210.00
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Recent activity
- REDEEMWill Bitcoin dip to $69,000 on May 28?$10.09May 29, 04:13 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin dip to $69,000 on May 28?$10.01May 28, 06:22 UTC
- REDEEMWill Google reach $340 in March?$12.16May 28, 06:14 UTC
- MAKER_REBATE$2.92Apr 3, 01:01 UTC
- TRADEBUYHyperliquid Up or Down - April 2, 12:00PM-4:00PM ET$210.00Apr 2, 16:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Google reach $340 in March?$12.00Mar 20, 06:54 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Amazon be the largest company in the world by market cap on June 30?$1.5KMar 20, 06:25 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Amazon be the largest company in the world by market cap on June 30?$1.5KMar 20, 05:58 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 5
- Avg trade size
- $666.39
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Mar 20, 05:58 UTC
- Last active
- May 29, 04:13 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".