Cuddly-Battalion
0x6f3e7f25baa7d2d49e15e2d2957ff3dec62cbcf8
Wallet digest
Activity score
82/100
Performance measurable
Open positions
9
Open notional
$38.7K
Total PnL
$-25.2K
Realised
$-7.6K
Win rate
67%
3 closed
Largest open positions
- JUAN MANUEL CERUNDOLO
Roland Garros ATP: Juan Manuel Cerundolo vs Matteo Berrettini
40000 shares @ 39.5¢·now 38.5¢·exp Jun 8, 2026$15.4K
$-400.00
- FLAVIO COBOLLI
Roland Garros ATP: Flavio Cobolli vs Zachary Svajda
13007 shares @ 89.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp Jun 7, 2026$13.0K
$1.4K
- NO
Will Flavio Cobolli win the 2026 Men's French Open?
5555 shares @ 88.6¢·now 87.5¢·exp Jun 7, 2026$4.9K
$-63.88
- YES
Will Brazil win the 2026 FIFA World Cup?
33333 shares @ 8.6¢·now 8.6¢·exp Jul 20, 2026$2.9K
$-16.67
- DIANE PARRY
Roland Garros WTA: Maja Chwalinska vs Diane Parry
5746 shares @ 35.0¢·now 37.5¢·exp Jun 7, 2026$2.2K
$143.65
- NO
Will Alexander Zverev win the 2026 Men's French Open?
349 shares @ 58.2¢·now 57.8¢·exp Jun 7, 2026$201.56
$-1.57
- YES
Will Germany win the 2026 FIFA World Cup?
2296 shares @ 5.4¢·now 5.5¢·exp Jul 20, 2026$127.43
$3.44
- TALIA GIBSON
Birmingham: Elvina Kalieva vs Talia Gibson
12856 shares @ 75.0¢·now 0.5¢·exp Jun 8, 2026$64.28
$-9.6K
- ANASTASIA POTAPOVA
Roland Garros WTA: Anastasia Potapova vs Anna Kalinskaya
14360 shares @ 63.1¢·now 0.1¢·exp Jun 8, 2026$7.18
$-9.1K
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYRoland Garros ATP: Juan Manuel Cerundolo vs Matteo Berrettini$7.8KJun 1, 11:59 UTC
- TRADEBUYRoland Garros WTA: Maja Chwalinska vs Diane Parry$29.63Jun 1, 10:49 UTC
- TRADEBUYRoland Garros WTA: Maja Chwalinska vs Diane Parry$5.38Jun 1, 10:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYRoland Garros WTA: Maja Chwalinska vs Diane Parry$10.77Jun 1, 10:46 UTC
- TRADEBUYRoland Garros WTA: Maja Chwalinska vs Diane Parry$5.38Jun 1, 10:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYRoland Garros WTA: Maja Chwalinska vs Diane Parry$10.77Jun 1, 10:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYRoland Garros WTA: Maja Chwalinska vs Diane Parry$16.15Jun 1, 10:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYRoland Garros WTA: Maja Chwalinska vs Diane Parry$1.10Jun 1, 10:41 UTC
- TRADEBUYRoland Garros WTA: Maja Chwalinska vs Diane Parry$11.94Jun 1, 10:39 UTC
- TRADEBUYRoland Garros WTA: Maja Chwalinska vs Diane Parry$5.44Jun 1, 10:38 UTC
- REDEEMWorld Championships: Switzerland vs. Finland$12.2KJun 1, 10:18 UTC
- TRADEBUYBirmingham: Elvina Kalieva vs Talia Gibson$45.00Jun 1, 10:10 UTC
- TRADEBUYBirmingham: Elvina Kalieva vs Talia Gibson$2.5KJun 1, 10:10 UTC
- TRADEBUYBirmingham: Elvina Kalieva vs Talia Gibson$19.44Jun 1, 10:10 UTC
- TRADEBUYBirmingham: Elvina Kalieva vs Talia Gibson$29.55Jun 1, 10:10 UTC
- TRADEBUYBirmingham: Elvina Kalieva vs Talia Gibson$75.00Jun 1, 10:10 UTC
- TRADEBUYBirmingham: Elvina Kalieva vs Talia Gibson$22.50Jun 1, 10:10 UTC
- TRADEBUYBirmingham: Elvina Kalieva vs Talia Gibson$39.00Jun 1, 10:10 UTC
- TRADEBUYBirmingham: Elvina Kalieva vs Talia Gibson$3.51Jun 1, 10:10 UTC
- TRADEBUYBirmingham: Elvina Kalieva vs Talia Gibson$19.13Jun 1, 10:10 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentLedger volume
$7.3K
Trades
1
Buy share
0%
Window
May 30, 10:30 UTC → May 30, 10:23 UTC
- SELLRoland Garros ATP: Francisco Cerundolo vs Zachary Svajda$7.3K@60¢May 30, 10:23 UTC
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$7.3K
1 trades
30d volume
$7.3K
1 trades
Buy share
0%
Sample
low
1 ledger trades
Top market concentration
Roland Garros ATP: Francisco Cerundolo vs Zachary Svajda
$7.3K · 100% of recorded whale volume
Recorded market concentration
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 49
- Avg trade size
- $324.37
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Jun 1, 10:09 UTC
- Last active
- Jun 1, 11:59 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 3 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".