Decent-Omega
0x709fa1246aa5cab8cf3e1ea45293364ddb295672
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
18
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-271.00
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 18- YES
Will 'Lilo & Stitch' gross between $160-170m opening weekend?
5000 shares @ 0.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 23, 2025$0.00
$-5.00
- YES
Will 'Lilo & Stitch' gross more than $170m opening weekend?
3152 shares @ 0.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 23, 2025$0.00
$-30.00
- YES
Will Elon tweet 200–214 times May 30–June 6?
2093 shares @ 1.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jun 6, 2025$0.00
$-25.00
- YES
Will Elon tweet 200–224 times May 9–16?
1000 shares @ 0.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 16, 2025$0.00
$-3.00
- YES
Will Elon tweet 200–224 times May 2–9?
624 shares @ 3.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 9, 2025$0.00
$-20.81
- YES
Will Elon tweet 225–249 times May 9–16?
178 shares @ 8.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 16, 2025$0.00
$-15.00
- YES
Will Elon tweet 140–154 times May 30–June 6?
167 shares @ 6.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jun 6, 2025$0.00
$-10.00
- YES
Will Elon tweet 100–124 times May 16–23?
143 shares @ 7.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 23, 2025$0.00
$-10.00
- NO
New Pope announced by May 9?
104 shares @ 33.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 9, 2025$0.00
$-34.19
- YES
Will Elon tweet 125–149 times May 16–23?
95 shares @ 21.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 23, 2025$0.00
$-20.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Elon tweet 215–229 times May 30–June 6?$7.00Jun 4, 17:38 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Elon tweet 200–214 times May 30–June 6?$25.00Jun 4, 17:38 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Elon tweet 185–199 times May 30–June 6?$15.00Jun 1, 15:07 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Elon tweet 170–184 times May 30–June 6?$10.00Jun 1, 15:07 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Elon tweet 155–169 times May 30–June 6?$10.00Jun 1, 15:07 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Elon tweet 140–154 times May 30–June 6?$10.00Jun 1, 15:07 UTC
- REDEEMWill Elon tweet 125–149 times May 23–30?$45.45Jun 1, 14:36 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Elon tweet 150–174 times May 23–30?$15.00May 26, 18:10 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Elon tweet 125–149 times May 23–30?$15.00May 26, 18:10 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Elon tweet 100–124 times May 23–30?$10.00May 26, 18:10 UTC
- TRADESELLWill 'Lilo & Stitch' gross between $150-160m opening weekend?$10.85May 26, 18:10 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill 'Lilo & Stitch' gross between $150-160m opening weekend?$45.00May 26, 13:46 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill 'Lilo & Stitch' gross between $160-170m opening weekend?$5.00May 26, 13:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill 'Lilo & Stitch' gross more than $170m opening weekend?$30.00May 24, 16:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYKlarna IPO in 2025?$30.00May 24, 16:28 UTC
- REDEEMWill Elon tweet 150–174 times May 16–23?$86.16May 24, 16:20 UTC
- TRADESELLUS-EU trade deal before June?$8.33May 23, 17:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYUS-EU trade deal before June?$10.00May 23, 17:21 UTC
- TRADESELLRussia x Ukraine ceasefire before June?$2.02May 22, 07:16 UTC
- TRADEBUYRussia x Ukraine ceasefire before June?$5.00May 19, 21:39 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 35
- Avg trade size
- $16.45
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 5, 09:56 UTC
- Last active
- Jun 4, 17:38 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".