Critical-Jodhpurs-Appendix
0x70b25addb54627955201ad8cb7a6d3a97e3a92d6
Wallet digest
Activity score
51/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
85
Open notional
$0.41
Total PnL
$-1.6K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 85- YES
FC Argeș Pitești leading at halftime?
29 shares @ 17.0¢·now 0.5¢·exp May 22, 2026$0.15
$-4.85
- YES
FC CFR 1907 Cluj leading at halftime?
24 shares @ 21.0¢·now 0.5¢·exp May 22, 2026$0.12
$-4.88
- YES
Pharco FC leading at halftime?
17 shares @ 12.0¢·now 0.4¢·exp May 22, 2026$0.07
$-1.93
- YES
National Bank of Egypt Club leading at halftime?
14 shares @ 14.0¢·now 0.4¢·exp May 22, 2026$0.06
$-1.94
- OVER
FC CFR 1907 Cluj vs. FC Argeș Pitești: O/U 2.5
29 shares @ 35.0¢·now 0.1¢·exp May 22, 2026$0.01
$-9.99
- YES
Will Beijing Guoan FC vs. Dalian Yingbo FC end in a draw?
539 shares @ 1.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 6, 2026$0.00
$-10.00
- OVER
RC Celta de Vigo vs. Elche CF: O/U 4.5
359 shares @ 27.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 3, 2026$0.00
$-96.85
- OVER
Lille OSC vs. Le Havre AC: O/U 4.5
337 shares @ 30.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 3, 2026$0.00
$-101.00
- OVER
Deportivo Toluca FC vs. CF Pachuca: O/U 3.5
324 shares @ 32.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 4, 2026$0.00
$-103.65
- OVER
FC Machida Zelvia vs. Yokohama F·Marinos: O/U 2.5
233 shares @ 23.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 6, 2026$0.00
$-53.53
Recent activity
- TRADESELLFC CFR 1907 Cluj vs. FC Argeș Pitești: O/U 1.5$51.43May 22, 19:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYFC CFR 1907 Cluj vs. FC Argeș Pitești: O/U 1.5$20.12May 22, 18:23 UTC
- TRADEBUYFC CFR 1907 Cluj leading at halftime?$5.12May 22, 18:04 UTC
- TRADEBUYFC Argeș Pitești leading at halftime?$5.12May 22, 18:04 UTC
- TRADEBUYFC CFR 1907 Cluj vs. FC Argeș Pitești: O/U 2.5$10.19May 22, 17:51 UTC
- TRADEBUYPharco FC leading at halftime?$2.05May 22, 17:36 UTC
- TRADEBUYNational Bank of Egypt Club leading at halftime?$2.05May 22, 17:36 UTC
- TRADESELLHNK Hajduk Split vs. HNK Vukovar 1991: O/U 4.5$44.67May 22, 17:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYHNK Hajduk Split vs. HNK Vukovar 1991: O/U 4.5$10.07May 22, 15:59 UTC
- TRADEBUYNK Osijek vs. NK Slaven Belupo: O/U 2.5$11.36May 22, 14:59 UTC
- TRADESELLAl Nassr Saudi Club vs. Damac Saudi Club: O/U 3.5$32.00May 21, 19:27 UTC
- TRADESELLAl Nassr Saudi Club vs. Damac Saudi Club: Both Teams to Score$26.26May 21, 19:27 UTC
- TRADEBUYAl Nassr Saudi Club vs. Damac Saudi Club: O/U 3.5$9.80May 21, 19:04 UTC
- TRADEBUYAl Nassr Saudi Club vs. Damac Saudi Club: Both Teams to Score$7.05May 21, 19:02 UTC
- TRADESELLMap Handicap: paiN (-1.5) vs BC.Game Esports (+1.5)$71.43May 21, 08:58 UTC
- TRADEBUYMap Handicap: paiN (-1.5) vs BC.Game Esports (+1.5)$23.35May 21, 06:05 UTC
- TRADEBUYSC Freiburg vs. Aston Villa FC: O/U 3.5$20.54May 20, 16:44 UTC
- TRADEBUYShanghai Shenhua FC vs. Wuhan San Zhen FC: O/U 4.5$10.18May 20, 13:25 UTC
- TRADEBUYLiaoning Tieren FC vs. Qingdao Hainiu FC: O/U 3.5$6.92May 20, 12:36 UTC
- TRADESELLZhejiang Zhiye FC vs. Shandong Taishan FC: O/U 4.5$6.91May 20, 12:35 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 50
- Avg trade size
- $25.95
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 15, 06:18 UTC
- Last active
- May 22, 19:21 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".