Reliable-Exception
0x71971342cb4c2555f60366ac62abdcdd1a1d14c8
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
23
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-130.3K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 23- OVER
Galatasaray SK vs. Liverpool FC: O/U 2.5
40463 shares @ 63.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 10, 2026$0.00
$-25.5K
- YES
Will RCD Espanyol de Barcelona win on 2026-03-09?
28781 shares @ 32.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 9, 2026$0.00
$-9.4K
- VILLANOVA WILDCATS
Utah State Aggies vs. Villanova Wildcats
19928 shares @ 49.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 20, 2026$0.00
$-10.0K
- TRAIL BLAZERS
Trail Blazers vs. Rockets
17912 shares @ 37.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 7, 2026$0.00
$-6.7K
- OVER
Chelsea FC vs. Newcastle United FC: O/U 1.5
16758 shares @ 44.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 14, 2026$0.00
$-7.4K
- YES
Will Rayo Vallecano de Madrid win on 2026-03-16?
15943 shares @ 44.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 16, 2026$0.00
$-7.0K
- OVER
Capitals vs. Bruins: O/U 4.5
15000 shares @ 45.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 7, 2026$0.00
$-6.7K
- OVER
Predators vs. Sabres: O/U 5.5
12000 shares @ 55.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 7, 2026$0.00
$-6.6K
- OVER
Chelsea FC vs. Newcastle United FC: O/U 2.5
11069 shares @ 58.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 14, 2026$0.00
$-6.4K
- OVER
St. Louis City SC vs. Seattle Sounders FC: O/U 1.5
10000 shares @ 74.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 8, 2026$0.00
$-7.5K
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYUtah State Aggies vs. Villanova Wildcats$10.0KMar 20, 21:05 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Rayo Vallecano de Madrid win on 2026-03-16?$2.6KMar 16, 20:30 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Rayo Vallecano de Madrid win on 2026-03-16?$4.4KMar 16, 20:30 UTC
- TRADEBUYChelsea FC vs. Newcastle United FC: O/U 1.5$356.51Mar 14, 19:14 UTC
- TRADEBUYChelsea FC vs. Newcastle United FC: O/U 1.5$2.41Mar 14, 19:14 UTC
- TRADEBUYChelsea FC vs. Newcastle United FC: O/U 1.5$6.3KMar 14, 19:14 UTC
- TRADEBUYChelsea FC vs. Newcastle United FC: O/U 1.5$106.48Mar 14, 19:14 UTC
- TRADEBUYChelsea FC vs. Newcastle United FC: O/U 1.5$248.11Mar 14, 19:14 UTC
- TRADEBUYChelsea FC vs. Newcastle United FC: O/U 1.5$2.20Mar 14, 19:14 UTC
- TRADEBUYChelsea FC vs. Newcastle United FC: O/U 1.5$107.36Mar 14, 19:14 UTC
- TRADEBUYChelsea FC vs. Newcastle United FC: O/U 1.5$107.36Mar 14, 19:14 UTC
- TRADEBUYChelsea FC vs. Newcastle United FC: O/U 1.5$114.20Mar 14, 19:14 UTC
- TRADEBUYChelsea FC vs. Newcastle United FC: O/U 1.5$0.79Mar 14, 19:14 UTC
- TRADEBUYChelsea FC vs. Newcastle United FC: O/U 2.5$4.6KMar 14, 18:23 UTC
- TRADEBUYChelsea FC vs. Newcastle United FC: O/U 2.5$1.9KMar 14, 18:23 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Burnley FC vs. AFC Bournemouth end in a draw?$71.86Mar 14, 16:36 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Burnley FC vs. AFC Bournemouth end in a draw?$3.5KMar 14, 16:36 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Burnley FC vs. AFC Bournemouth end in a draw?$1.46Mar 14, 16:36 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Burnley FC vs. AFC Bournemouth end in a draw?$8.87Mar 14, 16:36 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Burnley FC vs. AFC Bournemouth end in a draw?$95.41Mar 14, 16:36 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 50
- Avg trade size
- $1.4K
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Mar 14, 12:18 UTC
- Last active
- Mar 20, 21:05 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".