Unfolded-Executive
0x73ac07c937ae8a399400c547660895113491217c
Wallet digest
Activity score
54/100
Performance measurable
Open positions
54
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-2.7K
Realised
$718.89
Win rate
78%
18 closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 54- NO
Will NVIDIA (NVDA) close above $160 end of January?
1000 shares @ 12.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 30, 2026$0.00
$-120.50
- YES
Will NVIDIA (NVDA) close above $250 end of January?
1000 shares @ 3.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 30, 2026$0.00
$-30.15
- YES
Will NVIDIA (NVDA) close above $230 end of January?
1000 shares @ 7.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 30, 2026$0.00
$-74.00
- NO
Will NVIDIA (NVDA) close above $140 end of January?
1000 shares @ 3.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 30, 2026$0.00
$-33.98
- NO
Will NVIDIA (NVDA) close above $130 end of January?
1000 shares @ 3.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 30, 2026$0.00
$-31.64
- YES
Will NVIDIA (NVDA) close above $240 end of January?
1000 shares @ 3.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 30, 2026$0.00
$-31.07
- YES
Will NVIDIA (NVDA) close above $220 end of January?
996 shares @ 9.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 30, 2026$0.00
$-90.42
- NO
Will NVIDIA (NVDA) close above $150 end of January?
950 shares @ 8.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 30, 2026$0.00
$-83.69
- NO
Will Netflix (NFLX) close above $80 end of January?
900 shares @ 10.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 30, 2026$0.00
$-97.83
- NO
Will Google (GOOGL) close above $300 end of January?
897 shares @ 24.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 30, 2026$0.00
$-220.45
Recent activity
- REDEEMWill Meta (META) close above $540 end of January?$5.00Jan 31, 01:06 UTC
- REDEEMWill Meta (META) close above $760 end of January?$6.66Jan 31, 01:06 UTC
- REDEEMWill Meta (META) close above $740 end of January?$24.01Jan 31, 01:06 UTC
- REDEEMWill Google (GOOGL) close above $280 end of January?$44.95Jan 31, 01:06 UTC
- REDEEMWill Tesla (TSLA) close above $520 end of January?$52.90Jan 31, 01:06 UTC
- REDEEMWill Netflix (NFLX) close above $100 end of January?$64.29Jan 31, 01:06 UTC
- REDEEMWill Meta (META) close above $560 end of January?$69.00Jan 31, 01:06 UTC
- REDEEMWill Meta (META) close above $580 end of January?$70.00Jan 31, 01:06 UTC
- REDEEMWill Netflix (NFLX) close above $120 end of January?$70.89Jan 31, 01:06 UTC
- REDEEMWill Netflix (NFLX) close above $140 end of January?$100.00Jan 31, 01:06 UTC
- REDEEMWill Meta (META) close above $620 end of January?$137.00Jan 31, 01:06 UTC
- REDEEMWill Meta (META) close above $780 end of January?$140.00Jan 31, 01:06 UTC
- REDEEMWill Tesla (TSLA) close above $440 end of January?$172.26Jan 31, 01:06 UTC
- REDEEMWill Meta (META) close above $700 end of January?$180.00Jan 31, 01:06 UTC
- REDEEMWill Tesla (TSLA) close above $500 end of January?$216.55Jan 31, 01:06 UTC
- REDEEMWill Meta (META) close above $600 end of January?$236.00Jan 31, 01:06 UTC
- REDEEMWill Google (GOOGL) close above $340 end of January?$272.32Jan 31, 01:06 UTC
- REDEEMWill Tesla (TSLA) close above $470 end of January?$279.00Jan 31, 01:06 UTC
- REDEEMWill Tesla (TSLA) close above $430 end of January?$290.19Jan 31, 01:06 UTC
- REDEEMWill Apple (AAPL) close above $290 end of January?$310.94Jan 31, 01:06 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Wallet edge sanity
Needs review
38/100Useful as a watchlist input, but the edge claim still needs resolved history, cost, and source checks.
Many positions were entered near obvious prices, which can inflate win rate while hiding tail risk.
Required before treating wallet flow as useful
78% win rate over 18 closed markets.
A wallet trade is not useful unless a later follower could still enter after spread, slippage, and latency.
Large positions need enough depth to exit; mark-to-market PnL is not cash.
The trade still needs source, expiry, dispute, and settlement checks at the market level.
Leaderboards surface visible winners; losing or abandoned wallets disappear from attention.
Wallet intelligence filter
Watch only
14/100Wallet flow is useful for attention, but missing/review stages stop it from becoming paper attribution.
5 live trades, 0 ledger trades, copy-risk 42/100.
18 closed markets. Enough to inspect, not enough to trust.
No market-level spread or simulated execution cost is attached yet.
No source/expiry/dispute risk context is attached yet.
No market liquidity/depth context is attached yet.
No delayed-entry simulation is attached yet.
No paper receipts attribute this wallet signal to later outcomes yet.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 5
- Avg trade size
- $30.49
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Jan 6, 19:24 UTC
- Last active
- Jan 31, 01:06 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 18 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read; copy-risk is inverted so green means lower risk of over-reading the wallet.