Apprehensive-Punch
0x754d961102da54b0f9314cacafebfd559b11893b
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance measurable
Open positions
85
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-2.0K
Realised
$-5.75
Win rate
50%
6 closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 85- UNDER
Pumas de la UNAM vs. Querétaro FC: O/U 1.5
24778 shares @ 0.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 11, 2026$0.00
$-24.78
- OVER
AJ Auxerre vs. Paris Saint-Germain FC: O/U 1.5
625 shares @ 85.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 23, 2026$0.00
$-531.25
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - January 12, 2AM ET
538 shares @ 1.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 12, 2026$0.00
$-6.38
- OVER
Toledo Rockets vs. Kent State Golden Flashes: O/U 171.5
269 shares @ 81.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 16, 2026$0.00
$-218.21
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - January 11, 5:45PM-6:00PM ET
202 shares @ 4.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 11, 2026$0.00
$-8.12
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - January 12, 2:45AM-3:00AM ET
200 shares @ 3.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 12, 2026$0.00
$-6.00
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - January 12, 3AM ET
160 shares @ 3.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 12, 2026$0.00
$-4.80
- UNDER
AS Monaco FC vs. FC Lorient: O/U 1.5
100 shares @ 72.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 16, 2026$0.00
$-72.00
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - January 14, 6AM ET
100 shares @ 33.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 14, 2026$0.00
$-33.00
- OVER
Trail Blazers vs. Thunder: O/U 232.5
98 shares @ 51.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 1, 2026$0.00
$-50.00
Recent activity
- TRADESELLWill CF Estrela da Amadora vs. Estoril Praia end in a draw?$0.04Feb 26, 17:13 UTC
- REDEEMParis FC vs. Angers SCO: O/U 4.5$0.00Jan 31, 06:02 UTC
- REDEEMParis FC vs. Angers SCO: O/U 4.5$28.00Jan 31, 05:54 UTC
- TRADESELLFC Barcelona vs. Real Oviedo: O/U 4.5$197.80Jan 25, 17:28 UTC
- TRADESELLParis FC vs. Angers SCO: O/U 1.5$0.34Jan 25, 17:20 UTC
- TRADESELLParis FC vs. Angers SCO: O/U 1.5$9.86Jan 25, 17:19 UTC
- TRADEBUYFC Barcelona vs. Real Oviedo: O/U 4.5$81.60Jan 25, 16:06 UTC
- TRADEBUYFC Barcelona vs. Real Oviedo: O/U 4.5$108.48Jan 25, 16:05 UTC
- REDEEM1. FC Union Berlin vs. BV Borussia 09 Dortmund: O/U 4.5$30.00Jan 25, 15:56 UTC
- REDEEMWill Paris Saint-Germain FC win on 2026-01-23?$30.00Jan 25, 15:56 UTC
- REDEEMFC Internazionale Milano vs. Pisa SC: O/U 1.5$40.00Jan 25, 15:56 UTC
- REDEEM1. FC Union Berlin vs. BV Borussia 09 Dortmund: O/U 1.5$40.00Jan 25, 15:56 UTC
- REDEEMNewcastle United Jets FC vs. Wellington Phoenix FC: O/U 1.5$190.34Jan 25, 15:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYAJ Auxerre vs. Paris Saint-Germain FC: O/U 1.5$476.00Jan 23, 00:18 UTC
- REDEEMWill Estoril Praia win on 2026-01-19?$0.00Jan 23, 00:05 UTC
- REDEEMWill CF Estrela da Amadora win on 2026-01-19?$0.00Jan 23, 00:04 UTC
- TRADESELLFC Utrecht vs. KRC Genk: O/U 4.5$481.96Jan 22, 23:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYAJ Auxerre vs. Paris Saint-Germain FC: O/U 1.5$29.75Jan 22, 23:40 UTC
- TRADEBUYNewcastle United Jets FC vs. Wellington Phoenix FC: O/U 1.5$169.40Jan 22, 23:34 UTC
- REDEEMWill SC Freiburg win on 2026-01-22?$30.00Jan 22, 23:09 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 37
- Avg trade size
- $95.67
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Jan 22, 20:14 UTC
- Last active
- Feb 26, 17:13 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 6 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".