Leading-Estimate
0x76157be38d9ebcf595fe21d7919659c14db6d605
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
15
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-1.1K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 15- YES
Real Madrid vs. Celta Vigo: Both Teams to Score
505 shares @ 49.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 7, 2025$0.00
$-249.58
- YES
Will FK Bodø/Glimt win on 2025-12-10?
366 shares @ 6.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 10, 2025$0.00
$-25.05
- YES
Borussia Dortmund vs. 1899 Hoffenheim: Both Teams to Score
317 shares @ 37.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 7, 2025$0.00
$-118.99
- YES
Club Brugge KV vs. Arsenal FC: Both Teams to Score
266 shares @ 40.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 10, 2025$0.00
$-108.07
- NO
Will BV Borussia 09 Dortmund vs. FK Bodø/Glimt end in a draw?
217 shares @ 46.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 10, 2025$0.00
$-100.00
- OVER
SS Lazio vs. Bologna FC 1909: O/U 2.5
170 shares @ 59.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 7, 2025$0.00
$-100.39
- OVER
Borussia Dortmund vs. 1899 Hoffenheim: O/U 2.5
159 shares @ 29.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 7, 2025$0.00
$-46.00
- NO
Will Vejle BK win on 2025-12-08?
146 shares @ 13.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 8, 2025$0.00
$-19.80
- OVER
Girona vs. Real Madrid: O/U 2.5
139 shares @ 47.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 30, 2025$0.00
$-65.35
- RAPTORS
Celtics vs. Raptors
131 shares @ 36.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 7, 2025$0.00
$-47.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill FK Bodø/Glimt win on 2025-12-10?$0.05Dec 10, 21:49 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill FK Bodø/Glimt win on 2025-12-10?$0.90Dec 10, 21:46 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill FK Bodø/Glimt win on 2025-12-10?$6.10Dec 10, 21:46 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill FK Bodø/Glimt win on 2025-12-10?$18.00Dec 10, 21:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill BV Borussia 09 Dortmund vs. FK Bodø/Glimt end in a draw?$100.00Dec 10, 21:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: BV Borussia 09 Dortmund (-1.5)$44.50Dec 10, 21:26 UTC
- TRADEBUYClub Brugge KV vs. Arsenal FC: Both Teams to Score$0.27Dec 10, 21:18 UTC
- TRADEBUYClub Brugge KV vs. Arsenal FC: Both Teams to Score$20.80Dec 10, 21:18 UTC
- TRADEBUYClub Brugge KV vs. Arsenal FC: Both Teams to Score$40.55Dec 10, 21:11 UTC
- TRADEBUYClub Brugge KV vs. Arsenal FC: Both Teams to Score$1.45Dec 10, 21:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYClub Brugge KV vs. Arsenal FC: Both Teams to Score$45.00Dec 10, 20:46 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Villarreal CF vs. FC København end in a draw?$87.00Dec 10, 19:33 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Qarabağ Ağdam FK vs. AFC Ajax end in a draw?$16.59Dec 10, 19:25 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Qarabağ Ağdam FK vs. AFC Ajax end in a draw?$8.19Dec 10, 19:23 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Villarreal CF vs. FC København end in a draw?$43.00Dec 10, 19:22 UTC
- TRADEBUYAS Monaco FC vs. Galatasaray SK: Both Teams to Score$80.00Dec 9, 10:04 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: AC Milan (-1.5)$0.17Dec 8, 21:35 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: AC Milan (-1.5)$15.13Dec 8, 21:35 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: AC Milan (-1.5)$1.70Dec 8, 21:34 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Torino FC win on 2025-12-08?$58.28Dec 8, 21:16 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 49
- Avg trade size
- $43.59
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Dec 7, 16:33 UTC
- Last active
- Dec 10, 21:49 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".