Kooky-Micronutrient
0x762d89ab9db7c0c2e87892d3d4631a34783b45a6
Wallet digest
Activity score
60/100
Performance measurable
Open positions
7
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-1.0K
Realised
$-46.47
Win rate
75%
4 closed
Largest open positions
- AVULUS
Dota 2: AVULUS vs Rune Eaters - Game 1 Winner
664 shares @ 60.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 26, 2026$0.00
$-398.40
- YAKULT BROTHERS.TEARLAMENTS
Dota 2: REKONIX vs Yakult Brothers.Tearlaments - Game 1 Winner
353 shares @ 37.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 26, 2026$0.00
$-130.61
- CLOUD9
Valorant: Team Envy vs Cloud9 - Map 2 Winner
296 shares @ 39.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 26, 2026$0.00
$-115.69
- PLAYTIME
Dota 2: Vici Gaming vs PlayTime - Game 1 Winner
270 shares @ 37.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 26, 2026$0.00
$-99.88
- SHOPIFY REBELLION
LoL: FlyQuest vs Shopify Rebellion - Game 1 Winner
206 shares @ 65.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 26, 2026$0.00
$-135.52
- HANWHA LIFE ESPORTS CHALLENGERS
LoL: Nongshim Esports Academy vs Hanwha Life Esports Challengers - Game 3 Winner
203 shares @ 31.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 26, 2026$0.00
$-62.96
- STRONGBOYS
Dota 2: strongboys vs Nemiga Gaming - Game 1 Winner
49 shares @ 39.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 25, 2026$0.00
$-19.04
Recent activity
- REDEEMLoL: Bilibili Gaming vs JD Gaming - Game 2 Winner$903.44Jan 26, 20:15 UTC
- REDEEMDota 2: Zero Tenacity vs Pipsqueak+4 - Game 2 Winner$0.00Jan 26, 14:28 UTC
- REDEEMValorant: 100 Thieves vs Sentinels - Map 1 Winner$0.00Jan 26, 14:28 UTC
- REDEEMValorant: Team Envy vs Cloud9 (BO3) - VCT Americas Kickoff Playoffs$0.00Jan 26, 14:28 UTC
- REDEEMDota 2: Power Rangers vs skebob - Game 2 Winner$0.00Jan 26, 14:28 UTC
- REDEEMLoL: T1 Academy vs Dplus KIA Challengers - Game 2 Winner$0.00Jan 26, 14:28 UTC
- REDEEMLoL: LOS vs FURIA Esports (BO1) - CBLOL Cup Regular Season$0.00Jan 26, 14:28 UTC
- REDEEMLoL: T1 Academy vs Dplus KIA Challengers - Game 1 Winner$0.00Jan 26, 14:28 UTC
- REDEEMLoL: Bilibili Gaming vs JD Gaming - Game 1 Winner$0.00Jan 26, 14:28 UTC
- REDEEMDota 2: strongboys vs Nemiga Gaming - Game 2 Winner$0.00Jan 26, 14:28 UTC
- REDEEMLoL: Team Heretics vs Los Ratones (BO1) - LEC Versus Regular Season$0.00Jan 26, 14:28 UTC
- MERGELoL: Bilibili Gaming vs JD Gaming - Game 2 Winner$113.56Jan 26, 12:50 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Bilibili Gaming vs JD Gaming - Game 2 Winner$429.15Jan 26, 12:44 UTC
- MERGELoL: Bilibili Gaming vs JD Gaming - Game 2 Winner$535.81Jan 26, 12:44 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Bilibili Gaming vs JD Gaming - Game 2 Winner$119.67Jan 26, 12:43 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Bilibili Gaming vs JD Gaming - Game 2 Winner$2.01Jan 26, 12:43 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Bilibili Gaming vs JD Gaming - Game 2 Winner$116.58Jan 26, 12:40 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Bilibili Gaming vs JD Gaming - Game 2 Winner$51.59Jan 26, 12:38 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Bilibili Gaming vs JD Gaming - Game 2 Winner$113.60Jan 26, 12:36 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Bilibili Gaming vs JD Gaming - Game 2 Winner$222.00Jan 26, 12:36 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 33
- Avg trade size
- $308.33
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Jan 26, 11:01 UTC
- Last active
- Jan 26, 20:15 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 4 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".