Closed-Watch
0x79522d2fb634ce04142deb17e13ecd7285aa116a
Wallet digest
Activity score
71/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
1
Open notional
$14.29
Total PnL
$0.29
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Elon Musk post 300-319 tweets from October 7 to October 14, 2025?$14.00Oct 12, 11:42 UTC
- REDEEMSolana above $175 on February 28?$62.23Mar 1, 04:22 UTC
- TRADEBUYSolana above $175 on February 28?$62.17Feb 28, 14:34 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin above $97,000 on January 10?$62.17Jan 11, 04:00 UTC
- REDEEMNuggets vs. Spurs$0.00Jan 10, 14:41 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin above $97,000 on January 10?$61.86Jan 10, 14:39 UTC
- TRADEBUYNuggets vs. Spurs$46.12Jan 4, 08:45 UTC
- TRADESELLHuman to human bird flu transmission before February?$107.99Jan 4, 08:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYHuman to human bird flu transmission before February?$108.10Jan 4, 08:42 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 6
- Avg trade size
- $66.71
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Jan 4, 08:42 UTC
- Last active
- Oct 12, 11:42 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".