Cruel-Contention
0x79726bc557eff322c24ef0ac85e82f97bc9834c3
Wallet digest
Activity score
45/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
3
Open notional
$1.23
Total PnL
$-1.76
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - February 22, 9:55AM-10:00AM ET
1 shares @ 89.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp Feb 22, 2026$1.12
$0.12
- YES
Will the Iranian regime fall by June 30?
4 shares @ 22.9¢·now 2.5¢·exp Jun 30, 2026$0.11
$-0.89
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - March 10, 11:40AM-11:45AM ET
4 shares @ 24.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 10, 2026$0.00
$-0.99
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - March 10, 11:40AM-11:45AM ET$1.00Mar 10, 15:41 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the Iranian regime fall by June 30?$1.00Mar 10, 15:40 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - February 22, 9:55AM-10:00AM ET$1.00Feb 22, 14:58 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 3
- Avg trade size
- $1.00
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Feb 22, 14:58 UTC
- Last active
- Mar 10, 15:41 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".