Regal-Obesity
0x7a01fd34fa1ac11bea75623b1850ae0e53919320
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
43
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-315.18
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 43- YES
Arsenal FC vs. Liverpool FC: Both Teams to Score
42 shares @ 52.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 8, 2026$0.00
$-22.00
- OVER
Arsenal FC vs. Liverpool FC: O/U 2.5
39 shares @ 53.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 8, 2026$0.00
$-20.59
- UNDER
ACF Fiorentina vs. Udinese Calcio: O/U 2.5
35 shares @ 57.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 21, 2025$0.00
$-20.00
- ARSENAL FC
Spread: Arsenal FC (-1.5)
34 shares @ 47.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 27, 2025$0.00
$-16.00
- MANCHESTER UNITED FC
Spread: Manchester United FC (-1.5)
30 shares @ 47.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 30, 2025$0.00
$-13.97
- YES
Sunderland AFC vs. Manchester City FC: Both Teams to Score
25 shares @ 51.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 1, 2026$0.00
$-13.00
- UNDER
SSC Napoli vs. Hellas Verona FC: O/U 2.5
24 shares @ 55.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 7, 2026$0.00
$-13.00
- OVER
1. FSV Mainz 05 vs. FC St. Pauli 1910: O/U 2.5
22 shares @ 45.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 21, 2025$0.00
$-10.00
- OVER
Liverpool FC vs. Wolverhampton Wanderers FC: O/U 3.5
22 shares @ 5.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 27, 2025$0.00
$-1.10
- YES
Will Chelsea FC win on 2025-12-27?
21 shares @ 53.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 27, 2025$0.00
$-11.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYArsenal FC vs. Liverpool FC: O/U 2.5$20.59Jan 8, 11:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYArsenal FC vs. Liverpool FC: Both Teams to Score$22.00Jan 8, 11:33 UTC
- REDEEMEverton FC vs. Wolverhampton Wanderers FC: O/U 2.5$18.52Jan 8, 04:08 UTC
- REDEEMBologna FC 1909 vs. Atalanta BC: O/U 2.5$24.07Jan 8, 04:08 UTC
- TRADEBUYSS Lazio vs. ACF Fiorentina: Both Teams to Score$9.12Jan 7, 16:33 UTC
- TRADEBUYBologna FC 1909 vs. Atalanta BC: O/U 2.5$13.00Jan 7, 16:31 UTC
- TRADEBUYSSC Napoli vs. Hellas Verona FC: O/U 2.5$13.00Jan 7, 16:30 UTC
- TRADEBUYEverton FC vs. Wolverhampton Wanderers FC: O/U 2.5$10.00Jan 7, 16:25 UTC
- TRADEBUYEverton FC vs. Wolverhampton Wanderers FC: Both Teams to Score$10.00Jan 7, 16:24 UTC
- TRADESELLManchester City FC vs. Chelsea FC: O/U 3.5$19.58Jan 5, 00:43 UTC
- TRADEBUYManchester City FC vs. Chelsea FC: O/U 3.5$10.00Jan 4, 17:22 UTC
- TRADESELLFulham FC vs. Liverpool FC: O/U 2.5$22.62Jan 4, 17:18 UTC
- TRADESELLFulham FC vs. Liverpool FC: Both Teams to Score$22.92Jan 4, 17:18 UTC
- TRADEBUYFulham FC vs. Liverpool FC: Both Teams to Score$12.85Jan 4, 08:15 UTC
- TRADEBUYFulham FC vs. Liverpool FC: O/U 2.5$12.00Jan 4, 08:15 UTC
- REDEEMAFC Bournemouth vs. Arsenal FC: Both Teams to Score$24.85Jan 4, 08:10 UTC
- TRADEBUYAFC Bournemouth vs. Arsenal FC: Both Teams to Score$13.42Jan 2, 10:46 UTC
- TRADEBUYSunderland AFC vs. Manchester City FC: Both Teams to Score$13.00Jan 1, 11:39 UTC
- REDEEMNottingham Forest FC vs. Everton FC: Both Teams to Score$26.42Dec 30, 23:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: Manchester United FC (-1.5)$13.97Dec 30, 10:52 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 45
- Avg trade size
- $11.29
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Dec 27, 09:32 UTC
- Last active
- Jan 8, 11:34 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".