Conscious-Candidacy
0x80d48510a848a7ab645d0254c506af842a1b770e
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
63
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-6.2K
Realised
$-33.87
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 63- OVER
Chelsea FC vs. Brentford FC: O/U 2.5
1740 shares @ 48.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 17, 2026$0.00
$-842.00
- OVER
Manchester United FC vs. Manchester City FC: O/U 2.5
1160 shares @ 49.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 17, 2026$0.00
$-568.40
- OVER
Villarreal CF vs. FC Barcelona: O/U 3.5
1150 shares @ 51.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 21, 2025$0.00
$-586.32
- OVER
Leeds United FC vs. Manchester United FC: O/U 2.5
845 shares @ 58.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 4, 2026$0.00
$-489.99
- OVER
TSG 1899 Hoffenheim vs. Bayer 04 Leverkusen: O/U 2.5
700 shares @ 50.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 17, 2026$0.00
$-350.00
- UNDER
US Lecce vs. Parma Calcio 1913: O/U 1.5
537 shares @ 37.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 11, 2026$0.00
$-200.00
- NO
Genoa CFC vs. Pisa SC: Both Teams to Score
522 shares @ 57.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 3, 2026$0.00
$-300.00
- UNDER
SC Freiburg vs. Hamburger SV: O/U 2.5
490 shares @ 51.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 10, 2026$0.00
$-250.00
- OVER
Real Madrid CF vs. Rayo Vallecano de Madrid: O/U 3.5
432 shares @ 50.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 1, 2026$0.00
$-215.91
- YES
Cagliari Calcio vs. AS Roma: Both Teams to Score
423 shares @ 45.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 7, 2025$0.00
$-190.33
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYReal Madrid CF vs. Rayo Vallecano de Madrid: O/U 3.5$215.91Feb 1, 12:10 UTC
- REDEEMSS Lazio vs. Como 1907: Both Teams to Score$215.91Jan 27, 12:17 UTC
- TRADEBUYSS Lazio vs. Como 1907: Both Teams to Score$120.91Jan 19, 13:12 UTC
- REDEEMGetafe CF vs. Valencia CF: O/U 1.5$120.91Jan 19, 13:02 UTC
- TRADEBUYGetafe CF vs. Valencia CF: O/U 1.5$54.41Jan 18, 11:17 UTC
- REDEEMWill Chelsea FC win on 2026-01-17?$50.55Jan 18, 11:14 UTC
- TRADEBUYChelsea FC vs. Brentford FC: O/U 2.5$520.00Jan 17, 16:08 UTC
- TRADEBUYTSG 1899 Hoffenheim vs. Bayer 04 Leverkusen: O/U 2.5$250.00Jan 17, 15:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYTSG 1899 Hoffenheim vs. Bayer 04 Leverkusen: O/U 2.5$46.80Jan 17, 15:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYTSG 1899 Hoffenheim vs. Bayer 04 Leverkusen: O/U 2.5$53.20Jan 17, 15:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Chelsea FC win on 2026-01-17?$9.23Jan 17, 15:25 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Chelsea FC win on 2026-01-17?$1.10Jan 17, 15:24 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Chelsea FC win on 2026-01-17?$1.37Jan 17, 15:24 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Chelsea FC win on 2026-01-17?$12.56Jan 17, 15:24 UTC
- TRADEBUYChelsea FC vs. Brentford FC: O/U 2.5$322.00Jan 17, 15:18 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Chelsea FC win on 2026-01-17?$396.68Jan 17, 15:17 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Chelsea FC win on 2026-01-17?$88.74Jan 17, 15:17 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Chelsea FC win on 2026-01-17?$23.57Jan 17, 15:17 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Chelsea FC win on 2026-01-17?$1.00Jan 17, 15:17 UTC
- TRADESELLManchester United FC vs. Manchester City FC: O/U 1.5$699.30Jan 17, 15:16 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 42
- Avg trade size
- $202.29
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Dec 21, 23:04 UTC
- Last active
- Feb 1, 12:10 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 2 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".