Shoddy-Campaign
0x831a9c01637b3bbadf217698b529cd4366637350
Wallet digest
Activity score
43/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
1
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-440.80
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Recent activity
- REDEEMWill the highest temperature in New York City be 38°F or higher on December 30?$2.18Jan 30, 02:58 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Gity Meavedronu vs Priority (BO1) - Hitpoint Masters Group Stage$440.80Jan 28, 09:41 UTC
- TRADESELLWill xAI have the second best AI model at the end of December 2025?$1.7KDec 29, 09:15 UTC
- TRADESELLWill xAI have the second best AI model at the end of December 2025?$3.4KDec 29, 09:15 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the highest temperature in New York City be 38°F or higher on December 30?$2.15Dec 29, 09:02 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill xAI have the second best AI model at the end of December 2025?$5.0KDec 29, 08:58 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 5
- Avg trade size
- $2.1K
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Dec 29, 08:58 UTC
- Last active
- Jan 30, 02:58 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".