Traumatic-Sandpaper
0x8421fe13becf0f73b7f97277c1eadbe01c05bbb8
Wallet digest
Activity score
41/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
3
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-35.00
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- YES
Will the highest temperature in Chicago be between 34-35°F on February 24?
5000 shares @ 0.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 24, 2026$0.00
$-5.00
- NO
Will Alex Honnold free solo Taipei 101?
250 shares @ 8.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 23, 2026$0.00
$-20.00
- YES
Will Sport Lisboa e Benfica win on 2026-02-25?
45 shares @ 22.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 25, 2026$0.00
$-10.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Sport Lisboa e Benfica win on 2026-02-25?$10.00Feb 25, 21:32 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the highest temperature in Chicago be between 34-35°F on February 24?$5.00Feb 24, 23:58 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Alex Honnold free solo Taipei 101?$20.00Jan 25, 00:33 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 3
- Avg trade size
- $11.67
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Jan 25, 00:33 UTC
- Last active
- Feb 25, 21:32 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".