Competent-Junker
0x84279507a6757f6cd1db181ea02e13dcb978440d
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
20
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-177.49
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 20- NO
Barcelona vs. Atletico Madrid: Both Teams to Score
44 shares @ 34.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 2, 2025$0.00
$-15.00
- YES
Will Brighton vs. Aston Villa end in a draw?
42 shares @ 24.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 3, 2025$0.00
$-10.00
- YES
Will Newcastle win on 2025-12-02?
28 shares @ 54.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 2, 2025$0.00
$-15.00
- NO
Sunderland AFC vs. Arsenal: Both Teams to Score
25 shares @ 61.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 8, 2025$0.00
$-15.00
- OVER
Fulham vs. Sunderland AFC: O/U 2.5
22 shares @ 46.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 22, 2025$0.00
$-10.00
- YES
Burnley FC vs. Crystal Palace: Both Teams to Score
20 shares @ 49.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 3, 2025$0.00
$-10.00
- YES
Chelsea vs. Wolves: Both Teams to Score
20 shares @ 51.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 8, 2025$0.00
$-10.00
- YES
Manchester City vs. Sunderland AFC: Both Teams to Score
20 shares @ 51.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 6, 2025$0.00
$-10.00
- NO
Aston Villa vs. Arsenal: Both Teams to Score
20 shares @ 51.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 6, 2025$0.00
$-10.00
- YES
Wolves vs. Crystal Palace: Both Teams to Score
19 shares @ 52.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 22, 2025$0.00
$-10.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYTottenham vs. Brentford: Both Teams to Score$5.00Dec 6, 12:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYManchester City vs. Sunderland AFC: Both Teams to Score$10.00Dec 6, 12:32 UTC
- TRADEBUYBournemouth vs. Chelsea: Both Teams to Score$10.00Dec 6, 12:32 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Arsenal win on 2025-12-06?$10.00Dec 6, 12:31 UTC
- TRADEBUYAston Villa vs. Arsenal: Both Teams to Score$10.00Dec 6, 12:31 UTC
- REDEEMLeeds United vs. Chelsea: Both Teams to Score$18.18Dec 4, 04:31 UTC
- REDEEMLiverpool vs. Sunderland AFC: Both Teams to Score$19.61Dec 4, 04:31 UTC
- TRADESELLArsenal vs. Brentford: Both Teams to Score$0.63Dec 3, 20:35 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Brighton vs. Aston Villa end in a draw?$10.00Dec 3, 19:40 UTC
- TRADEBUYLiverpool vs. Sunderland AFC: Both Teams to Score$10.00Dec 3, 19:37 UTC
- TRADEBUYLeeds United vs. Chelsea: Both Teams to Score$10.00Dec 3, 19:36 UTC
- TRADEBUYBurnley FC vs. Crystal Palace: Both Teams to Score$10.00Dec 3, 19:35 UTC
- TRADEBUYArsenal vs. Brentford: Both Teams to Score$0.55Dec 3, 19:32 UTC
- REDEEMBournemouth vs. Everton: O/U 1.5$22.12Dec 3, 08:01 UTC
- REDEEMFulham vs. Manchester City: Both Teams to Score$25.42Dec 3, 08:01 UTC
- TRADEBUYBournemouth vs. Everton: O/U 1.5$5.75Dec 2, 10:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYBarcelona vs. Atletico Madrid: Both Teams to Score$15.00Dec 2, 10:39 UTC
- TRADEBUYFulham vs. Manchester City: Both Teams to Score$15.00Dec 2, 10:38 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Newcastle win on 2025-12-02?$15.00Dec 2, 10:37 UTC
- REDEEMGetafe vs. Atletico Madrid: Both Teams to Score$12.50Dec 2, 10:36 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 36
- Avg trade size
- $8.40
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Nov 29, 22:11 UTC
- Last active
- Dec 6, 12:34 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".