Glittering-Bargain
0x8461896d405bf8fee43b8f2f8f40a2ff856fd485
Wallet digest
Activity score
66/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
3
Open notional
$15.12
Total PnL
$-1.39
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill the EU impose new tariffs on US goods in 2025?$5.00Jul 24, 18:36 UTC
- TRADESELLFed decreases interest rates by 50+ bps after July 2025 meeting?$19.98Jul 23, 21:52 UTC
- TRADESELLWill the price of Bitcoin be between $117K and $119K on July 23?$5.99Jul 23, 17:32 UTC
- TRADEBUYAnother GTA VI trailer released in 2025?$10.00Jul 22, 18:10 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the price of Bitcoin be between $117K and $119K on July 23?$2.16Jul 22, 17:49 UTC
- TRADEBUY10-year Treasury yield >4.4% Friday?$1.51Jul 20, 21:25 UTC
- TRADEBUYFed decreases interest rates by 50+ bps after July 2025 meeting?$19.98Jul 18, 19:27 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 7
- Avg trade size
- $9.23
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Jul 18, 19:27 UTC
- Last active
- Jul 24, 18:36 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".