Dear-Crocodile
0x84a416e3ead7c0ccfa049b9cc134235a8d690c89
Wallet digest
Activity score
44/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
1
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-525.00
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYNYA (NYA) Up or Down on January 30?$525.00Jan 30, 14:47 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Bitcoin dip to $50,000 in January?$1.3KJan 7, 10:53 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Bitcoin dip to $50,000 in January?$20.00Jan 7, 10:53 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin dip to $50,000 in January?$1.3KJan 7, 10:25 UTC
- REDEEMTroy vs. James Madison$3.23Dec 25, 07:22 UTC
- TRADEBUYTroy vs. James Madison$3.00Dec 5, 06:11 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Apple (AAPL) close at $255-$260 on the final day of trading of the week of Dec 1 – Dec 5?$1.3KDec 5, 05:58 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Apple (AAPL) close at $255-$260 on the final day of trading of the week of Dec 1 – Dec 5?$1.3KDec 5, 05:04 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 7
- Avg trade size
- $812.48
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Dec 5, 05:04 UTC
- Last active
- Jan 30, 14:47 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".