Vigilant-Stumbling
0x84df2fe9fa0494b252d62fbe2069e5568fc14de5
Wallet digest
Activity score
79/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
1
Open notional
$53.71
Total PnL
$0.11
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill BNB dip to $500 in May?$53.61May 27, 05:07 UTC
- REDEEMWill Solana dip to $70 May 11-17?$53.60May 27, 05:04 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Solana dip to $70 May 11-17?$53.55May 16, 04:07 UTC
- REDEEMWill Solana dip to $20 May 4-10?$53.55May 16, 04:06 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Solana dip to $20 May 4-10?$53.50May 6, 06:41 UTC
- REDEEMWill Solana reach $130 in April?$53.51May 6, 06:40 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Solana reach $130 in April?$53.46Apr 27, 08:54 UTC
- REDEEMWill Bitcoin dip to $68,000 on April 14?$53.46Apr 27, 08:54 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin dip to $68,000 on April 14?$53.41Apr 14, 13:15 UTC
- REDEEMWill Solana reach $120 April 6-12?$53.41Apr 14, 09:53 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Solana reach $120 April 6-12?$53.36Apr 7, 10:52 UTC
- REDEEMWill Ethereum dip to $800 in March?$53.36Apr 7, 10:51 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Ethereum dip to $800 in March?$53.25Mar 25, 09:44 UTC
- REDEEMWill Solana dip to $40 March 16-22?$53.25Mar 25, 09:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Solana dip to $40 March 16-22?$53.14Mar 18, 02:20 UTC
- REDEEMWill BNB reach $1,200 in February?$22.02Mar 18, 02:19 UTC
- REDEEMWill Solana dip to $20 in February?$31.12Mar 18, 02:19 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Solana dip to $20 in February?$31.09Feb 26, 09:37 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill BNB reach $1,200 in February?$22.00Feb 26, 09:37 UTC
- REDEEMWill Ethereum reach $2,400 February 16-22?$53.09Feb 26, 09:36 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Wallet edge sanity
Do not mirror
0/100Treat this wallet as noise/context only until resolved history, copy-risk, and liquidity checks improve.
Win rate is hidden until at least 3 closed markets exist for this wallet.
Large size, concentration, or thin history makes this wallet unsafe to imitate.
Required before treating wallet flow as useful
Only 0 closed markets; headline win rate is intentionally hidden.
A wallet trade is not useful unless a later follower could still enter after spread, slippage, and latency.
Large positions need enough depth to exit; mark-to-market PnL is not cash.
The trade still needs source, expiry, dispute, and settlement checks at the market level.
Leaderboards surface visible winners; losing or abandoned wallets disappear from attention.
Wallet intelligence filter
Blocked
0/100Wallet flow is blocked as an intelligence signal until hard failures are fixed.
Wallet activity exists, but copy-risk is too high for interpretation.
Too few closed markets. Do not infer edge from open PnL or leaderboard rank.
No market-level spread or simulated execution cost is attached yet.
No source/expiry/dispute risk context is attached yet.
No market liquidity/depth context is attached yet.
No delayed-entry simulation is attached yet.
No paper receipts attribute this wallet signal to later outcomes yet.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 12
- Avg trade size
- $437.78
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Feb 14, 04:19 UTC
- Last active
- May 27, 05:07 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read; copy-risk is inverted so green means lower risk of over-reading the wallet.