Vengeful-Violation
0x8548f0fae7636fc17ca6bb2cbae39cbd4fbce4c1
Wallet digest
Activity score
85/100
Performance measurable
Open positions
21
Open notional
$1.4K
Total PnL
$-662.42
Realised
$6.43
Win rate
75%
4 closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 21- NO
1win to win 2-0?
641 shares @ 99.9¢·now 100.0¢·exp Jul 31, 2026$640.68
$0.32
- NO
MOUZ to win 2-0?
600 shares @ 99.9¢·now 100.0¢·exp Jul 31, 2026$599.70
$0.30
- OVER
Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5
73 shares @ 98.4¢·now 100.0¢·exp Jul 31, 2026$73.28
$1.16
- GENTLE MATES
Map 1 Rounds Handicap: BBL Esports (-2.5) vs Gentle Mates (+2.5)
43 shares @ 98.8¢·now 100.0¢·exp Jul 31, 2026$42.52
$0.50
- LEGACY
Counter-Strike: Natus Vincere vs Legacy - Map 2 Winner
500 shares @ 2.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jun 12, 2026$0.00
$-10.00
- FUSION
Map 1 Rounds Handicap: Contra (-3.5) vs FUSION (+3.5)
250 shares @ 0.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jun 26, 2026$0.00
$-0.25
- BBL ESPORTS
Valorant: EDward Gaming vs BBL Esports - Map 1 Winner
214 shares @ 87.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jul 2, 2026$0.00
$-185.92
- THEMONGOLZ
Counter-Strike: TheMongolz vs Spirit - Map 2 Winner
200 shares @ 1.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 10, 2026$0.00
$-2.00
- THEMONGOLZ
Counter-Strike: FaZe vs TheMongolz - Map 1 Winner
200 shares @ 98.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jul 31, 2026$0.00
$-196.00
- JD GAMING
Valorant: JD Gaming vs XLG Gaming - Map 1 Winner
140 shares @ 90.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 23, 2026$0.00
$-126.00
Recent activity
- REDEEMCounter-Strike: HOTU vs G2 Ares (BO3) - Stake Pulse Beat I Group A$343.66Jul 31, 16:42 UTC
- REDEEMDota 2: 1win vs Vici Gaming - Game 1 Winner$8.0KJul 31, 16:40 UTC
- TRADEBUYMap 1 Rounds Handicap: BBL Esports (-2.5) vs Gentle Mates (+2.5)$42.04Jul 31, 15:53 UTC
- TRADEBUYMap 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5$72.18Jul 31, 15:49 UTC
- TRADESELLGamerLegion to win 2-0?$898.99Jul 31, 15:12 UTC
- TRADESELLGamerLegion to win 2-0?$100.00Jul 31, 15:12 UTC
- REDEEMCounter-Strike: Sinners vs Rune Eaters (BO3) - CCT Europe Series #5 Playoffs$4.8KJul 31, 15:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Sinners vs Rune Eaters (BO3) - CCT Europe Series #5 Playoffs$80.04Jul 31, 14:57 UTC
- TRADEBUYDota 2: 1win vs Vici Gaming - Game 1 Winner$176.64Jul 31, 14:51 UTC
- TRADEBUYDota 2: 1win vs Vici Gaming - Game 1 Winner$79.92Jul 31, 14:49 UTC
- TRADEBUYDota 2: 1win vs Vici Gaming - Game 1 Winner$1.01Jul 31, 14:48 UTC
- TRADEBUYDota 2: 1win vs Vici Gaming - Game 1 Winner$1.5KJul 31, 14:48 UTC
- TRADEBUYDota 2: 1win vs Vici Gaming - Game 1 Winner$269.72Jul 31, 14:48 UTC
- TRADEBUYDota 2: 1win vs Vici Gaming - Game 1 Winner$99.90Jul 31, 14:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYDota 2: 1win vs Vici Gaming - Game 1 Winner$96.90Jul 31, 14:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYDota 2: 1win vs Vici Gaming - Game 1 Winner$69.93Jul 31, 14:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYDota 2: 1win vs Vici Gaming - Game 1 Winner$139.84Jul 31, 14:46 UTC
- TRADEBUYDota 2: 1win vs Vici Gaming - Game 1 Winner$2.2KJul 31, 14:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYDota 2: 1win vs Vici Gaming - Game 1 Winner$6.55Jul 31, 14:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYDota 2: 1win vs Vici Gaming - Game 1 Winner$499.49Jul 31, 14:45 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentLedger volume
$5.2K
Trades
1
Buy share
100%
Window
Jun 15, 13:00 UTC → Jun 15, 12:53 UTC
- BUYMap Handicap: MGLZ (-1.5) vs 9z (+1.5)$5.2K@95¢Jun 15, 12:53 UTC
Wallet edge sanity
Do not mirror
14/100Treat this wallet as noise/context only until resolved history, copy-risk, and liquidity checks improve.
Closed-market sample is still too small to treat the win rate as durable.
Large size, concentration, or thin history makes this wallet unsafe to imitate.
Many positions were entered near obvious prices, which can inflate win rate while hiding tail risk.
Required before treating wallet flow as useful
75% win rate over 4 closed markets.
A wallet trade is not useful unless a later follower could still enter after spread, slippage, and latency.
Large positions need enough depth to exit; mark-to-market PnL is not cash.
The trade still needs source, expiry, dispute, and settlement checks at the market level.
Leaderboards surface visible winners; losing or abandoned wallets disappear from attention.
Wallet intelligence filter
Watch only
0/100Wallet flow is useful for attention, but missing/review stages stop it from becoming paper attribution.
45 live trades, 1 ledger trades, copy-risk 72/100.
4 closed markets. Enough to inspect, not enough to trust.
No market-level spread or simulated execution cost is attached yet.
No source/expiry/dispute risk context is attached yet.
No market liquidity/depth context is attached yet.
No delayed-entry simulation is attached yet.
No paper receipts attribute this wallet signal to later outcomes yet.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
100%
Sample
low
1 ledger trades
Top market concentration
Map Handicap: MGLZ (-1.5) vs 9z (+1.5)
$5.2K · 100% of recorded whale volume
Recorded market concentration
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 45
- Avg trade size
- $295.52
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Jul 31, 13:09 UTC
- Last active
- Jul 31, 16:42 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 4 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read; copy-risk is inverted so green means lower risk of over-reading the wallet.