Mad-Reorganization
0x8637652822041dbfaec0e33c7e71db6d4125d0cb
Activity score
65/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
4
Open notional
$94.93
Total PnL
$-72.27
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- YES
Victor Wembanyama: Points O/U 26.5
198 shares @ 45.0¢·now 48.0¢·exp May 7, 2026$94.93
$5.93
- YES
Jayson Tatum: Rebounds O/U 10.5
75 shares @ 37.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 2, 2026$0.00
$-28.33
- SAW
Counter-Strike: SAW vs RoundsGG (BO1) - Esplay Elite Gaming Group B
58 shares @ 69.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 2, 2026$0.00
$-39.88
- YES
Cade Cunningham: Assists O/U 9.5
25 shares @ 40.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 1, 2026$0.00
$-10.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYVictor Wembanyama: Points O/U 26.5$90.4718h ago
- REDEEMJulius Randle: Points O/U 21.5$26.4418h ago
- REDEEMJaden McDaniels: Points O/U 16.5$55.6818h ago
- TRADEBUYJaden McDaniels: Points O/U 16.5$30.422d ago
- TRADEBUYJulius Randle: Points O/U 21.5$15.192d ago
- TRADEBUYJayson Tatum: Rebounds O/U 10.5$28.864d ago
- TRADESELLPisa SC vs. US Lecce: O/U 3.5$114.074d ago
- TRADEBUYPisa SC vs. US Lecce: O/U 3.5$100.375d ago
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: SAW vs RoundsGG (BO1) - Esplay Elite Gaming Group B$2.725d ago
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: SAW vs RoundsGG (BO1) - Esplay Elite Gaming Group B$37.525d ago
- TRADEBUYCade Cunningham: Assists O/U 9.5$10.185d ago
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 9
- Avg trade size
- $47.76
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- 5d ago
- Last active
- 18h ago
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".
