Astonishing-Fowl
0x881a54ec4a118a7133c1ed37817cb8ffd4cd8d6d
Wallet digest
Activity score
53/100
Performance measurable
Open positions
200
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-2.8K
Realised
$235.68
Win rate
58%
38 closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 200- YES
Will Elon tweet less than 215 times August 8–August 15?
5129 shares @ 0.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Aug 15, 2025$0.00
$-43.40
- YES
Will Elon tweet 230–244 times August 8–August 15?
2849 shares @ 0.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Aug 15, 2025$0.00
$-21.44
- YES
Will Elon tweet 215–229 times August 8–August 15?
2641 shares @ 0.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Aug 15, 2025$0.00
$-13.12
- YES
Will Elon tweet 90–104 times August 1–August 8?
2426 shares @ 1.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Aug 8, 2025$0.00
$-27.65
- YES
Will Elon tweet 245–259 times August 8–August 15?
1631 shares @ 1.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Aug 15, 2025$0.00
$-18.87
- YES
Will Elon tweet 105–119 times August 1–August 8?
1493 shares @ 1.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Aug 8, 2025$0.00
$-27.65
- YES
Will Elon tweet 260–274 times August 8–August 15?
1332 shares @ 1.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp Aug 15, 2025$0.00
$-18.21
- YES
Will Elon tweet 120–134 times August 1–August 8?
1209 shares @ 2.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Aug 8, 2025$0.00
$-26.32
- YES
Will Elon Musk post 100-119 tweets from September 23 to September 30, 2025?
1000 shares @ 0.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Sep 30, 2025$0.00
$-1.00
- YES
Will Elon tweet 275–289 times August 8–August 15?
863 shares @ 2.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Aug 15, 2025$0.00
$-18.59
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Olympique Lyonnais win on 2026-03-19?$1.18Mar 19, 17:19 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Tottenham Hotspur FC win on 2026-03-18?$0.46Mar 18, 21:41 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Tottenham Hotspur FC win on 2026-03-18?$1.00Mar 18, 20:29 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Liverpool FC win on 2026-03-18?$1.00Mar 18, 20:00 UTC
- TRADESELLWill FC Barcelona win on 2026-03-18?$2.72Mar 18, 19:15 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill FC Barcelona win on 2026-03-18?$1.75Mar 18, 16:10 UTC
- REDEEMWill Arsenal FC win on 2026-03-17?$1.75Mar 18, 16:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Arsenal FC win on 2026-03-17?$1.33Mar 17, 19:06 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Silkeborg IF win on 2026-03-16?$1.33Mar 16, 19:37 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Rayo Vallecano de Madrid win on 2026-03-16?$1.63Mar 16, 19:19 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Brentford FC win on 2026-03-16?$1.00Mar 16, 19:18 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill ACF Fiorentina win on 2026-03-16?$1.00Mar 16, 19:17 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Silkeborg IF win on 2026-03-16?$1.00Mar 16, 17:51 UTC
- REDEEMWill Real Sociedad de Fútbol win on 2026-03-15?$2.00Mar 16, 17:15 UTC
- TRADESELLWill AC Milan win on 2026-03-15?$0.34Mar 15, 20:41 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill SS Lazio win on 2026-03-15?$1.00Mar 15, 20:41 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Lille OSC win on 2026-03-15?$1.00Mar 15, 20:40 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Stade Rennais FC 1901 win on 2026-03-15?$0.35Mar 15, 20:40 UTC
- TRADEBUYBNP Paribas Open: Aryna Sabalenka vs Elena Rybakina$1.00Mar 15, 20:30 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Lille OSC win on 2026-03-15?$1.00Mar 15, 20:30 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 48
- Avg trade size
- $1.39
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Mar 15, 14:16 UTC
- Last active
- Mar 19, 17:19 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 38 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".