Wild-Soap
0x886ebc1070c1870a62d67427fa9781c5b1b0afd6
Activity score
75/100
Performance measurable
Open positions
80
Open notional
$24.6K
Total PnL
$-154.9K
Realised
$166.97
Win rate
50%
6 closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 80- DPLUS KIA
LoL: BNK FEARX vs Dplus KIA (BO3) - LCK Rounds 1-2
18924 shares @ 83.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp Apr 30, 2026$18.9K
$3.2K
- FOKUS
Counter-Strike: Passion UA vs FOKUS (BO3) - Stake Ranked Episode 2: Closed Qualifier Playoffs
6505 shares @ 60.0¢·now 59.5¢·exp Apr 30, 2026$3.9K
$-31.21
- TOP ESPORTS
LoL: Top Esports vs Anyone's Legend (BO3) - LPL Group Ascend
3873 shares @ 45.0¢·now 45.5¢·exp May 1, 2026$1.8K
$19.37
- HEROIC
Dota 2: Heroic vs Team Liquid (BO3) - PGL Wallachia Playoffs
15193 shares @ 33.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 14, 2026$0.00
$-5.1K
- NATUS VINCERE
LoL: Natus Vincere vs Team Vitality (BO3) - LEC Regular Season
14816 shares @ 48.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 4, 2026$0.00
$-7.2K
- NO
Will Liverpool FC win on 2026-03-18?
14600 shares @ 27.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 18, 2026$0.00
$-3.9K
- G2 ESPORTS
LoL: G2 Esports vs Bilibili Gaming (BO5) - First Stand Playoffs
14133 shares @ 28.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 22, 2026$0.00
$-4.0K
- ICI JAPON CORP. ESPORT
LoL: Solary vs Ici Japon Corp. Esport (BO1) - LFL Regular Season
13558 shares @ 23.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 23, 2026$0.00
$-3.1K
- NO
Will Club Atlético de Madrid win on 2026-02-24?
13448 shares @ 29.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 24, 2026$0.00
$-3.9K
- NATUS VINCERE
Counter-Strike: Vitality vs Natus Vincere (BO5) - BLAST Open Rotterdam Playoffs
13316 shares @ 16.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 29, 2026$0.00
$-2.1K
Recent activity
- TRADESELLLoL: Top Esports vs Anyone's Legend (BO3) - LPL Group Ascend$98.514h ago
- TRADESELLLoL: Top Esports vs Anyone's Legend (BO3) - LPL Group Ascend$987.264h ago
- TRADESELLLoL: Top Esports vs Anyone's Legend (BO3) - LPL Group Ascend$98.724h ago
- TRADESELLLoL: Top Esports vs Anyone's Legend (BO3) - LPL Group Ascend$998.404h ago
- TRADESELLLoL: Top Esports vs Anyone's Legend (BO3) - LPL Group Ascend$98.514h ago
- TRADESELLLoL: Top Esports vs Anyone's Legend (BO3) - LPL Group Ascend$987.264h ago
- TRADESELLLoL: Top Esports vs Anyone's Legend (BO3) - LPL Group Ascend$98.724h ago
- TRADESELLLoL: Top Esports vs Anyone's Legend (BO3) - LPL Group Ascend$998.404h ago
- TRADESELLLoL: Top Esports vs Anyone's Legend (BO3) - LPL Group Ascend$5.005h ago
- TRADESELLLoL: Top Esports vs Anyone's Legend (BO3) - LPL Group Ascend$3.005h ago
- TRADESELLLoL: BNK FEARX vs Dplus KIA (BO3) - LCK Rounds 1-2$81.566h ago
- TRADEBUYLoL: BNK FEARX vs Dplus KIA (BO3) - LCK Rounds 1-2$15.9K6h ago
- TRADESELLLoL: Top Esports vs Anyone's Legend (BO3) - LPL Group Ascend$410.147h ago
- TRADESELLCounter-Strike: Passion UA vs FOKUS (BO3) - Stake Ranked Episode 2: Closed Qualifier Playoffs$46.429h ago
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Passion UA vs FOKUS (BO3) - Stake Ranked Episode 2: Closed Qualifier Playoffs$4.0K9h ago
- REDEEMCounter-Strike: Natus Vincere vs FaZe (BO3) - BLAST Rivals Group B$17.3K9h ago
- TRADESELLCounter-Strike: Natus Vincere vs FaZe (BO3) - BLAST Rivals Group B$14.5323h ago
- TRADESELLCounter-Strike: Natus Vincere vs FaZe (BO3) - BLAST Rivals Group B$14.5323h ago
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Natus Vincere vs FaZe (BO3) - BLAST Rivals Group B$2.3K23h ago
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Natus Vincere vs FaZe (BO3) - BLAST Rivals Group B$2.3K23h ago
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 42
- Avg trade size
- $2.4K
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- 7d ago
- Last active
- 4h ago
- Win rate sample
- 6 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".