Wet-User
0x88de6908e7a8272b2a6a4af92d2b966497201091
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
81
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-7.1K
Realised
$0.01
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 81- YES
Will Al Hazem SC win on 2026-01-18?
1490 shares @ 13.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 18, 2026$0.00
$-201.68
- YES
Will Al Fayha Saudi Club win on 2026-01-22?
1161 shares @ 6.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 22, 2026$0.00
$-74.04
- YES
Will Fatih Karagümrük SK win on 2026-01-24?
947 shares @ 10.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 24, 2026$0.00
$-99.23
- OVER
Fatih Karagümrük SK vs. Galatasaray SK: O/U 4.5
800 shares @ 25.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 24, 2026$0.00
$-204.27
- UNDER
Trabzonspor vs. Kasımpaşa SK: O/U 1.5
800 shares @ 18.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 23, 2026$0.00
$-144.09
- OVER
SC Heerenveen vs. FC Groningen: O/U 4.5
800 shares @ 15.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 18, 2026$0.00
$-120.07
- UNDER
Kayserispor vs. Rams Başakşehir FK: O/U 1.5
800 shares @ 19.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 24, 2026$0.00
$-153.46
- OVER
Kasımpaşa SK vs. Antalyaspor: O/U 3.5
800 shares @ 24.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 18, 2026$0.00
$-192.09
- YES
Will Gaziantep FK win on 2026-01-17?
800 shares @ 6.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 17, 2026$0.00
$-48.01
- YES
Will NEOM SC win on 2026-01-18?
800 shares @ 13.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 18, 2026$0.00
$-109.81
Recent activity
- TRADESELLCharlton Athletic FC vs. Portsmouth FC: O/U 3.5$45.26Feb 17, 21:01 UTC
- TRADESELLCharlton Athletic FC vs. Portsmouth FC: O/U 3.5$72.69Feb 17, 21:01 UTC
- TRADESELLCharlton Athletic FC vs. Portsmouth FC: O/U 3.5$48.46Feb 17, 21:01 UTC
- TRADESELLCharlton Athletic FC vs. Portsmouth FC: O/U 3.5$50.00Feb 17, 21:01 UTC
- TRADESELLCharlton Athletic FC vs. Portsmouth FC: O/U 3.5$28.58Feb 17, 21:00 UTC
- TRADESELLBlackburn Rovers FC vs. Sheffield Wednesday FC: O/U 1.5$111.03Feb 3, 21:31 UTC
- TRADESELLBlackburn Rovers FC vs. Sheffield Wednesday FC: O/U 1.5$99.06Feb 3, 21:31 UTC
- TRADESELLBlackburn Rovers FC vs. Sheffield Wednesday FC: O/U 1.5$13.41Feb 3, 21:31 UTC
- REDEEMTelstar 1963 vs. AZ: O/U 1.5$0.63Jan 26, 16:01 UTC
- TRADESELLFeyenoord Rotterdam vs. Heracles Almelo: O/U 1.5$5.29Jan 25, 01:46 UTC
- TRADESELLFeyenoord Rotterdam vs. Heracles Almelo: O/U 1.5$1.10Jan 25, 01:46 UTC
- TRADESELLFeyenoord Rotterdam vs. Heracles Almelo: O/U 1.5$12.96Jan 25, 01:46 UTC
- TRADESELLFeyenoord Rotterdam vs. Heracles Almelo: O/U 1.5$9.96Jan 25, 01:46 UTC
- TRADESELLFeyenoord Rotterdam vs. Heracles Almelo: O/U 1.5$3.00Jan 25, 01:46 UTC
- TRADESELLFeyenoord Rotterdam vs. Heracles Almelo: O/U 1.5$1.53Jan 25, 01:46 UTC
- TRADESELLFeyenoord Rotterdam vs. Heracles Almelo: O/U 1.5$38.16Jan 25, 01:46 UTC
- REDEEMFC Twente '65 vs. SBV Excelsior: O/U 1.5$798.91Jan 25, 00:28 UTC
- TRADEBUYTelstar 1963 vs. AZ: O/U 1.5$0.11Jan 25, 00:00 UTC
- TRADEBUYGaziantep FK vs. Konyaspor: O/U 4.5$1.76Jan 24, 22:51 UTC
- TRADEBUYGaziantep FK vs. Konyaspor: O/U 4.5$0.57Jan 24, 22:51 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 47
- Avg trade size
- $21.49
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Jan 24, 16:40 UTC
- Last active
- Feb 17, 21:01 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 2 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".