Miserable-Refuge
0x894e141f28daa2ba2952d531b8a92f8b008ea4cb
Wallet digest
Activity score
41/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
3
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-104.00
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- NO
Will the announcers say "Holloway" or "Oliveira" 15+ times during Holloway vs. Oliveira 2?
766 shares @ 8.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 7, 2026$0.00
$-61.00
- YES
US forces enter Iran by March 7?
722 shares @ 1.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 3, 2026$0.00
$-13.00
- YES
US forces enter Iran by March 14?
158 shares @ 19.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 1, 2026$0.00
$-30.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYUS forces enter Iran by March 7?$13.00Mar 7, 11:46 UTC
- TRADEBUYUS forces enter Iran by March 14?$30.00Mar 7, 11:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the announcers say "Holloway" or "Oliveira" 15+ times during Holloway vs. Oliveira 2?$61.00Mar 7, 11:38 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 3
- Avg trade size
- $34.67
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Mar 7, 11:38 UTC
- Last active
- Mar 7, 11:46 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".