Exemplary-Summit
0x89e03f3397f15e66822ff2826b2fc385d499e058
Wallet digest
Activity score
83/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
2
Open notional
$49.62
Total PnL
$1.02
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Serena Williams Play at Wimbledon 2026?$43.69Jun 21, 19:12 UTC
- TRADEBUYLibema Open (Doubles): Arribage/Olivetti vs Borges/Polmans$4.95Jun 10, 15:39 UTC
- REDEEMSenators vs. Penguins$0.00Jan 15, 12:27 UTC
- REDEEMWill Bitcoin reach $105,000 in December?$0.00Jan 15, 12:27 UTC
- REDEEMHellenic Championship: Stan Wawrinka vs Botic van de Zandschulp$0.00Jan 15, 12:27 UTC
- REDEEMBlackhawks vs. Panthers$0.00Jan 15, 12:27 UTC
- REDEEMWill Al Fateh Saudi Club win on 2026-01-10?$0.00Jan 15, 12:26 UTC
- REDEEMWill Fury beat Usyk?$0.00Jan 15, 12:26 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Senegal vs. Egypt end in a draw?$3.30Jan 14, 17:19 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Senegal vs. Egypt end in a draw?$3.55Jan 14, 17:02 UTC
- REDEEMCounter-Strike: FORZE Reload vs STATE (BO3)$5.00Jan 14, 17:01 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: FORZE Reload vs STATE (BO3)$3.90Jan 14, 09:18 UTC
- TRADESELLWill VfB Stuttgart win on 2026-01-13?$20.00Jan 13, 19:27 UTC
- TRADESELLWill VfB Stuttgart win on 2026-01-13?$99.00Jan 13, 19:26 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill VfB Stuttgart win on 2026-01-13?$172.71Jan 13, 19:26 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill VfB Stuttgart win on 2026-01-13?$91.00Jan 13, 19:20 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Al Okhdood SC win on 2026-01-13?$1.4KJan 13, 16:39 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Al Okhdood SC win on 2026-01-13?$557.88Jan 13, 16:38 UTC
- REDEEMSevilla FC vs. RC Celta de Vigo: O/U 1.5$500.00Jan 13, 06:06 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Sevilla FC vs. RC Celta de Vigo end in a draw?$1.92Jan 12, 22:08 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Wallet edge sanity
Do not mirror
0/100Treat this wallet as noise/context only until resolved history, copy-risk, and liquidity checks improve.
Win rate is hidden until at least 3 closed markets exist for this wallet.
Large size, concentration, or thin history makes this wallet unsafe to imitate.
Required before treating wallet flow as useful
Only 0 closed markets; headline win rate is intentionally hidden.
A wallet trade is not useful unless a later follower could still enter after spread, slippage, and latency.
Large positions need enough depth to exit; mark-to-market PnL is not cash.
The trade still needs source, expiry, dispute, and settlement checks at the market level.
Leaderboards surface visible winners; losing or abandoned wallets disappear from attention.
Wallet intelligence filter
Blocked
0/100Wallet flow is blocked as an intelligence signal until hard failures are fixed.
Wallet activity exists, but copy-risk is too high for interpretation.
Too few closed markets. Do not infer edge from open PnL or leaderboard rank.
No market-level spread or simulated execution cost is attached yet.
No source/expiry/dispute risk context is attached yet.
No market liquidity/depth context is attached yet.
No delayed-entry simulation is attached yet.
No paper receipts attribute this wallet signal to later outcomes yet.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 39
- Avg trade size
- $116.87
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Jan 11, 07:55 UTC
- Last active
- Jun 21, 19:12 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read; copy-risk is inverted so green means lower risk of over-reading the wallet.