0x8b3eeb3ea135c9b2246b1b78adce71a4c580662c
0x8b3eeb3ea135c9b2246b1b78adce71a4c580662c
Wallet digest
Activity score
44/100
Performance measurable
Open positions
36
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-48.6K
Realised
$-1.4K
Win rate
35%
17 closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 36- YES
Will the price of Bitcoin be less than $114K on July 25?
22084 shares @ 11.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jul 25, 2025$0.00
$-2.4K
- YES
Will the price of Bitcoin be less than $115K on July 23?
16553 shares @ 16.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jul 23, 2025$0.00
$-2.7K
- NO
Will the price of Bitcoin be less than $120K on July 21?
16228 shares @ 26.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jul 21, 2025$0.00
$-4.2K
- YES
Will the price of Bitcoin be greater than $120K on July 30?
15554 shares @ 23.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jul 30, 2025$0.00
$-3.7K
- YES
Bitcoin above $120,000 on July 23?
14721 shares @ 27.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jul 23, 2025$0.00
$-4.0K
- YES
Will the price of Bitcoin be greater than $120K on July 25?
13905 shares @ 26.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jul 25, 2025$0.00
$-3.6K
- YES
Will the price of Bitcoin be less than $106K on July 16?
11100 shares @ 10.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jul 16, 2025$0.00
$-1.2K
- YES
Will the price of Bitcoin be less than $115K on July 28?
9807 shares @ 21.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jul 28, 2025$0.00
$-2.1K
- YES
Will the price of Bitcoin be less than $114K on July 30?
9371 shares @ 16.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jul 30, 2025$0.00
$-1.5K
- NO
Solana above $180 on July 23?
8741 shares @ 56.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jul 23, 2025$0.00
$-5.0K
Recent activity
- REDEEMWill the price of Bitcoin be less than $115K on August 4?$2.4KAug 4, 19:52 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin above $118,000 on July 30?$191.77Aug 1, 17:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin above $118,000 on July 30?$166.53Jul 29, 16:46 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the price of Bitcoin be greater than $118K on August 1?$352.33Jul 29, 16:41 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin above $118,000 on July 30?$1.46Jul 29, 16:37 UTC
- TRADESELLBitcoin above $118,000 on July 30?$247.90Jul 29, 16:37 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin above $118,000 on July 30?$38.00Jul 29, 16:17 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin above $118,000 on July 30?$102.80Jul 29, 16:17 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin above $118,000 on July 30?$29.20Jul 29, 16:17 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin above $118,000 on July 30?$175.32Jul 29, 16:14 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin above $118,000 on July 30?$38.00Jul 29, 16:13 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin above $118,000 on July 30?$5.20Jul 29, 16:13 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin above $118,000 on July 30?$76.00Jul 29, 16:08 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin above $118,000 on July 30?$24.42Jul 29, 15:43 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin above $118,000 on July 30?$3.85Jul 29, 15:19 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin above $118,000 on July 30?$422.07Jul 29, 15:09 UTC
- TRADESELLBitcoin above $118,000 on July 30?$341.48Jul 29, 14:52 UTC
- TRADESELLBitcoin above $118,000 on July 30?$17.35Jul 29, 14:51 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin above $118,000 on July 30?$5.40Jul 29, 14:13 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin above $118,000 on July 30?$3.18Jul 29, 14:12 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 46
- Avg trade size
- $130.36
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Jul 28, 18:42 UTC
- Last active
- Aug 4, 19:52 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 17 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".