Deadly-Soot
0x8cc698d51a3f06874902e822f988c6bc3d2185f2
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
14
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-2.3K
Realised
$-8.55
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 14- UNDER
Timberwolves vs. Warriors: O/U 223.5
900 shares @ 52.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 14, 2026$0.00
$-468.00
- HEROIC
Dota 2: Heroic vs Team Liquid - Game 1 Winner
800 shares @ 40.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 14, 2026$0.00
$-320.00
- UNDER
Newcastle United Jets FC vs. Auckland FC: O/U 2.5
711 shares @ 33.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 14, 2026$0.00
$-234.63
- UNDER
Games Total: O/U 2.5
591 shares @ 50.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 24, 2026$0.00
$-295.50
- NO
Melbourne Victory FC vs. Macarthur FC: Both Teams to Score
487 shares @ 36.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 15, 2026$0.00
$-175.32
- PARIVISION
Dota 2: PARIVISION vs Aurora - Game 2 Winner
399 shares @ 45.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 24, 2026$0.00
$-180.43
- OVER
AC Monza vs. Modena FC 2018: O/U 1.5
300 shares @ 50.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 24, 2026$0.00
$-149.96
- UNDER
Real Salt Lake vs. Austin FC: O/U 2.5
265 shares @ 49.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 15, 2026$0.00
$-129.85
- OVER
Jeju SK FC vs. FC Seoul: O/U 3.5
219 shares @ 23.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 15, 2026$0.00
$-50.37
- OVER
FK Kolos Kovalivka vs. SK Poltava: O/U 2.5
197 shares @ 53.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 25, 2026$0.00
$-104.54
Recent activity
- REDEEMTSV Fortuna 95 Düsseldorf vs. SG Dynamo Dresden: O/U 2.5$0.12Apr 25, 01:15 UTC
- MAKER_REBATE$6.20Apr 25, 01:00 UTC
- TRADESELLSunderland AFC vs. Nottingham Forest FC: Both Teams to Score$8.10Apr 24, 19:45 UTC
- TRADESELLSunderland AFC vs. Nottingham Forest FC: Both Teams to Score$25.80Apr 24, 19:45 UTC
- TRADESELLSunderland AFC vs. Nottingham Forest FC: Both Teams to Score$38.01Apr 24, 19:43 UTC
- TRADEBUYSunderland AFC vs. Nottingham Forest FC: Both Teams to Score$15.00Apr 24, 19:41 UTC
- TRADEBUYSunderland AFC vs. Nottingham Forest FC: Both Teams to Score$62.71Apr 24, 19:40 UTC
- TRADESELLSunderland AFC vs. Nottingham Forest FC: O/U 2.5$0.75Apr 24, 19:32 UTC
- TRADESELLSunderland AFC vs. Nottingham Forest FC: O/U 2.5$246.96Apr 24, 19:32 UTC
- TRADESELLSunderland AFC vs. Nottingham Forest FC: O/U 2.5$4.28Apr 24, 19:32 UTC
- TRADEBUYSunderland AFC vs. Nottingham Forest FC: O/U 2.5$32.53Apr 24, 19:30 UTC
- TRADEBUYSunderland AFC vs. Nottingham Forest FC: O/U 2.5$8.91Apr 24, 19:30 UTC
- TRADEBUYSunderland AFC vs. Nottingham Forest FC: O/U 2.5$63.28Apr 24, 19:29 UTC
- TRADEBUYSunderland AFC vs. Nottingham Forest FC: O/U 2.5$63.28Apr 24, 19:29 UTC
- TRADESELLDota 2: Team Liquid vs BetBoom Team - Game 2 Winner$363.99Apr 24, 19:19 UTC
- TRADESELLReal Betis Balompié vs. Real Madrid CF: O/U 2.5$256.19Apr 24, 19:11 UTC
- TRADEBUYReal Betis Balompié vs. Real Madrid CF: O/U 2.5$284.21Apr 24, 19:01 UTC
- TRADEBUYAC Monza vs. Modena FC 2018: O/U 1.5$1.92Apr 24, 18:36 UTC
- TRADEBUYAC Monza vs. Modena FC 2018: O/U 1.5$23.04Apr 24, 18:36 UTC
- TRADEBUYAC Monza vs. Modena FC 2018: O/U 1.5$23.04Apr 24, 18:36 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 48
- Avg trade size
- $81.51
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Apr 24, 16:10 UTC
- Last active
- Apr 25, 01:15 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 1 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read; copy-risk is inverted so green means lower risk of over-reading the wallet.