Made-Up-Manhunt
0x8d31c6ff1646fd5626a63d95db9f98fe52537d43
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
120
Open notional
$0.01
Total PnL
$-371.93
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 120- YES
Will the Democratic Party of Korea win 10 or more seats in South Korea’s June 3, 2026 parliamentary by-elections?
1 shares @ 98.0¢·now 0.9¢·exp Jun 3, 2026$0.01
$-0.99
- YES
Will the NYC Mayoral Democratic Primary be decided in round 12 or later?
4200 shares @ 0.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jun 24, 2025$0.00
$-4.20
- YES
Will Crin Antonescu be the next Mayor of Bucharest?
2000 shares @ 0.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 7, 2025$0.00
$-2.00
- YES
Will Ximena Rincón win the Chilean presidential election?
1010 shares @ 0.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 16, 2025$0.00
$-1.01
- YES
Will Elizabeth Warren win the popular vote in the 2024 Presidential Election?
1000 shares @ 0.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 5, 2024$0.00
$-1.00
- YES
Will Adrienne Adams win second place in the 2025 NYC mayoral election?
1000 shares @ 0.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 4, 2025$0.00
$-1.00
- YES
Will a candidate other than Andrew Cuomo or Zohran Mamdani win the New York City Mayoral Democratic Primary?
1000 shares @ 0.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jun 24, 2025$0.00
$-1.00
- YES
Will the Cincinnati Reds win the World Series?
1000 shares @ 0.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 2, 2024$0.00
$-1.00
- YES
Will AOC win the popular vote in the 2024 Presidential Election?
1000 shares @ 0.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 5, 2024$0.00
$-1.00
- YES
Will Andrew Cuomo’s RCV margin of victory be between 6% and 9% in the New York City Mayoral Democratic Primary?
1000 shares @ 0.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jun 24, 2025$0.00
$-1.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill the Democratic Party of Korea win 10 or more seats in South Korea’s June 3, 2026 parliamentary by-elections?$1.00Jun 3, 14:11 UTC
- REDEEMWill "The Boroughs" be the top US Netflix show this week?$1.01Jun 2, 21:48 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill "The Boroughs" be the top US Netflix show this week?$1.00Jun 2, 14:29 UTC
- REDEEMJazz vs. Kings$1.69Mar 18, 19:52 UTC
- TRADEBUY76ers vs. Nuggets$1.00Mar 17, 22:07 UTC
- TRADEBUYThunder vs. Magic$2.00Mar 17, 22:07 UTC
- TRADEBUYMavericks vs. Pelicans$2.00Mar 16, 23:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYWarriors vs. Wizards$2.50Mar 16, 22:03 UTC
- TRADEBUYJazz vs. Kings$1.00Mar 16, 01:05 UTC
- REDEEMHornets vs. Spurs$2.90Mar 15, 20:04 UTC
- TRADEBUYPistons vs. Raptors$2.00Mar 15, 19:24 UTC
- TRADEBUYHornets vs. Spurs$2.00Mar 14, 19:16 UTC
- REDEEMSuns vs. Bucks$4.45Mar 14, 18:56 UTC
- REDEEMMavericks vs. Grizzlies$4.48Mar 14, 18:56 UTC
- REDEEMTimberwolves vs. Clippers$4.54Mar 14, 18:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYNets vs. 76ers$1.00Mar 14, 16:28 UTC
- TRADEBUYWizards vs. Celtics$1.00Mar 14, 14:55 UTC
- TRADEBUYTimberwolves vs. Warriors$2.00Mar 14, 01:17 UTC
- TRADEBUYBulls vs. Clippers$2.00Mar 13, 23:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYMavericks vs. Grizzlies$3.00Mar 12, 23:29 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 35
- Avg trade size
- $2.23
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Mar 3, 00:00 UTC
- Last active
- Jun 3, 14:11 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".