Anchored-Majorleague
0x8d6d385d6d6cd9e79528936c185244837b41b306
Wallet digest
Activity score
66/100
Performance measurable
Open positions
59
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-558.23
Realised
$9.51
Win rate
89%
9 closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 59- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - November 16, 7:30AM-7:45AM ET
204 shares @ 98.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 16, 2025$0.00
$-200.00
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - October 31, 6:30AM-6:45AM ET
145 shares @ 3.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Oct 31, 2025$0.00
$-5.70
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - October 31, 7:45AM-8:00AM ET
120 shares @ 5.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Oct 31, 2025$0.00
$-6.00
- UNDER
Arsenal FC vs. Aston Villa FC: O/U 3.5
119 shares @ 89.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 30, 2025$0.00
$-106.27
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - October 31, 6:45AM-7:00AM ET
75 shares @ 2.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Oct 31, 2025$0.00
$-2.10
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - October 25, 10:45PM-11:00PM ET
65 shares @ 4.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Oct 26, 2025$0.00
$-2.70
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - October 26, 5:15AM-5:30AM ET
60 shares @ 6.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Oct 26, 2025$0.00
$-3.60
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - November 24, 12:00AM-12:15AM ET
50 shares @ 2.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 24, 2025$0.00
$-1.00
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - December 2, 9:30AM-9:45AM ET
44 shares @ 46.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 2, 2025$0.00
$-20.40
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - October 31, 11:00AM-11:15AM ET
43 shares @ 94.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Oct 31, 2025$0.00
$-40.43
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYArsenal FC vs. Aston Villa FC: O/U 3.5$106.27Dec 30, 21:22 UTC
- TRADESELLNottingham Forest FC vs. Everton FC: O/U 3.5$106.27Dec 30, 21:20 UTC
- TRADEBUYNottingham Forest FC vs. Everton FC: O/U 3.5$100.00Dec 30, 20:48 UTC
- TRADESELLMavericks vs. Trail Blazers$112.20Dec 30, 06:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYMavericks vs. Trail Blazers$104.09Dec 30, 06:10 UTC
- TRADEBUYMavericks vs. Trail Blazers$3.65Dec 30, 06:03 UTC
- TRADESELLMagic vs. Raptors: O/U 224.5$107.19Dec 30, 03:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYMagic vs. Raptors: O/U 224.5$101.39Dec 30, 02:55 UTC
- TRADESELLSuns vs. Wizards: O/U 240.5$101.94Dec 30, 02:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYSuns vs. Wizards: O/U 240.5$100.00Dec 30, 02:08 UTC
- REDEEMWill the price of Bitcoin be above $86,000 on December 29?$117.74Dec 30, 00:35 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the price of Bitcoin be above $86,000 on December 29?$66.43Dec 29, 14:23 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the price of Bitcoin be above $86,000 on December 29?$43.02Dec 29, 14:22 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Melbourne Victory FC win on 2025-12-29?$1.21Dec 29, 10:04 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - December 29, 4:45AM-5:00AM ET$108.24Dec 29, 10:04 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - December 29, 4:45AM-5:00AM ET$107.16Dec 29, 09:55 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Melbourne Victory FC win on 2025-12-29?$1.20Dec 29, 09:23 UTC
- REDEEMPistons vs. Clippers: O/U 225.5$108.36Dec 29, 09:22 UTC
- TRADEBUYPistons vs. Clippers: O/U 225.5$105.11Dec 29, 04:18 UTC
- TRADESELLGrizzlies vs. Wizards: O/U 241.5$105.06Dec 29, 01:53 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 43
- Avg trade size
- $63.17
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Dec 28, 09:04 UTC
- Last active
- Dec 30, 21:22 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 9 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".