0x8f62e9ad1024d2eef310af4eb6bde467309ffc8a
0x8f62e9ad1024d2eef310af4eb6bde467309ffc8a
Wallet digest
Activity score
44/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
2
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-300.50
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Atlético Madrid beat Seattle Sounders?$10.50Jun 19, 12:37 UTC
- TRADESELLSolana Up or Down - June 19, 7PM ET$2.50Jun 19, 11:55 UTC
- TRADESELLWill the price of Ethereum be between $2400 and $2500 on June 19 at 5 PM ET?$7.60Jun 19, 11:54 UTC
- TRADEBUYSolana Up or Down - June 19, 7PM ET$2.50Jun 19, 10:59 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the price of Ethereum be between $2400 and $2500 on June 19 at 5 PM ET?$7.80Jun 19, 10:51 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - June 18, 7 AM ET$10.00Jun 19, 08:13 UTC
- TRADEBUYSolana Up or Down - June 18, 11 AM ET$290.00Jun 18, 09:08 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - June 18, 7 AM ET$5.00Jun 18, 07:33 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 7
- Avg trade size
- $46.56
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Jun 18, 07:33 UTC
- Last active
- Jun 19, 12:37 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".