Composed-Banana
0x8f6df0305ccb28bb95cb5fd98c3f26567cee6b4e
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
15
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-2.2K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 15- YES
Will the San Diego Padres win the 2025 National League Championship?
5446 shares @ 5.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Oct 31, 2025$0.00
$-273.38
- YES
Will the Boston Red Sox win the 2025 American League Championship?
3101 shares @ 4.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Oct 31, 2025$0.00
$-127.09
- YES
Will Alabama win the 2026 College Football National Championship?
2778 shares @ 5.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 20, 2026$0.00
$-150.00
- YES
US strikes Iran by January 26, 2026?
2749 shares @ 12.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 31, 2026$0.00
$-330.00
- YES
Will the US next strike Iran on January 23, 2026 (ET)?
991 shares @ 5.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 31, 2026$0.00
$-50.00
- YES
Will SMU win the 2025 ACC Conference Championship Game?
400 shares @ 52.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 7, 2025$0.00
$-208.00
- CHARGERS
Spread: Chargers (-2.5)
388 shares @ 51.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 16, 2025$0.00
$-198.11
- SAINTS
Falcons vs. Saints
359 shares @ 46.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 30, 2025$0.00
$-165.14
- RED WINGS
Islanders vs. Red Wings
343 shares @ 56.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 20, 2025$0.00
$-192.00
- CAPITALS
Lightning vs. Capitals
319 shares @ 53.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 22, 2025$0.00
$-169.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYUS strikes Iran by January 26, 2026?$150.00Jan 23, 02:33 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the US next strike Iran on January 23, 2026 (ET)?$50.00Jan 23, 02:30 UTC
- TRADEBUYUS strikes Iran by January 26, 2026?$180.00Jan 23, 02:05 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill SMU win the 2025 ACC Conference Championship Game?$174.72Nov 24, 23:18 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Alabama win the 2026 College Football National Championship?$150.00Nov 24, 23:03 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill SMU win the 2025 ACC Conference Championship Game?$21.84Nov 24, 23:00 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill TreVeyon Henderson record the most rushing yards by a rookie running back?$7.60Nov 24, 23:00 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill SMU win the 2025 ACC Conference Championship Game?$11.44Nov 24, 22:54 UTC
- REDEEMBrowns vs. Raiders: O/U 37.5$400.00Nov 24, 22:52 UTC
- REDEEMSpread: Patriots (-5.5)$138.46Nov 24, 01:12 UTC
- TRADEBUYLightning vs. Capitals$169.00Nov 22, 14:43 UTC
- TRADEBUYKraken vs. Penguins$162.00Nov 22, 14:42 UTC
- REDEEMWild vs. Penguins$277.78Nov 22, 14:40 UTC
- TRADESELLNo change in Fed interest rates after December 2025 meeting?$183.20Nov 22, 02:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYNo change in Fed interest rates after December 2025 meeting?$85.00Nov 21, 13:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYNo change in Fed interest rates after December 2025 meeting?$115.93Nov 21, 13:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYWild vs. Penguins$125.00Nov 21, 13:00 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: Patriots (-5.5)$72.00Nov 21, 12:53 UTC
- REDEEMGolden Knights vs. Utah$311.54Nov 21, 12:48 UTC
- REDEEMStars vs. Canucks$341.71Nov 21, 12:48 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 44
- Avg trade size
- $58.76
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Nov 17, 14:37 UTC
- Last active
- Jan 23, 02:33 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".