Adorable-Real
0x8fd1536113a96b3615825f397ad1cfc8dbd7bfe8
Wallet digest
Activity score
70/100
Performance measurable
Open positions
200
Open notional
$499.75
Total PnL
$-171.5K
Realised
$7.4K
Win rate
39%
83 closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 200- T1
LoL: Nongshim Red Force vs T1 - Game 1 Winner
500 shares @ 45.6¢·now 100.0¢·exp Aug 3, 2026$499.75
$271.79
- NONGSHIM RED FORCE
LoL: Nongshim Red Force vs Hanwha Life Esports - Game 2 Winner
20500 shares @ 5.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 23, 2026$0.00
$-1.1K
- TOP ESPORTS
LoL: Top Esports vs Bilibili Gaming - Game 1 Winner
13010 shares @ 6.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 15, 2026$0.00
$-853.14
- NONGSHIM RED FORCE
LoL: Nongshim Red Force vs Hanwha Life Esports - Game 2 Winner
12665 shares @ 16.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 25, 2026$0.00
$-2.1K
- HANJIN BRION
LoL: Hanwha Life Esports vs HANJIN BRION - Game 2 Winner
12108 shares @ 8.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 19, 2026$0.00
$-1.1K
- NINJAS IN PYJAMAS
LoL: Ninjas in Pyjamas vs EDward Gaming - Game 3 Winner
11009 shares @ 25.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 24, 2026$0.00
$-2.8K
- TEAM WE
LoL: ThunderTalk Gaming vs Team WE - Game 1 Winner
11000 shares @ 8.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Aug 2, 2026$0.00
$-962.75
- T1
LoL: T1 vs Gen.G - Game 1 Winner
11000 shares @ 17.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jun 14, 2026$0.00
$-1.9K
- THUNDERTALK GAMING
LoL: Top Esports vs ThunderTalk Gaming (BO3) - LPL Group Ascend
11000 shares @ 31.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jul 25, 2026$0.00
$-3.5K
- NINJAS IN PYJAMAS
LoL: Ninjas in Pyjamas vs JD Gaming - Game 2 Winner
10518 shares @ 16.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 29, 2026$0.00
$-1.8K
Recent activity
- TRADESELLLoL: Nongshim Red Force vs T1 - Game 1 Winner$371.37Aug 3, 11:08 UTC
- TRADESELLLoL: Nongshim Red Force vs T1 - Game 1 Winner$396.00Aug 3, 11:08 UTC
- TRADESELLLoL: Nongshim Red Force vs T1 - Game 1 Winner$58.63Aug 3, 10:48 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Nongshim Red Force vs T1 - Game 1 Winner$216.48Aug 3, 10:41 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Nongshim Red Force vs T1 - Game 1 Winner$3.62Aug 3, 10:41 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Nongshim Red Force vs T1 - Game 1 Winner$157.78Aug 3, 10:38 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Nongshim Red Force vs T1 - Game 1 Winner$12.42Aug 3, 10:38 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Nongshim Red Force vs T1 - Game 1 Winner$61.41Aug 3, 10:38 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Nongshim Red Force vs T1 - Game 1 Winner$240.12Aug 3, 10:36 UTC
- MAKER_REBATE$51.63Aug 3, 00:45 UTC
- TAKER_REBATE$32.03Aug 3, 00:10 UTC
- REDEEMLoL: Top Esports vs JD Gaming - Game 1 Winner$4.0KAug 2, 17:28 UTC
- REDEEMLoL: LNG Esports vs Invictus Gaming - Game 1 Winner$93.38Aug 2, 14:54 UTC
- TRADESELLLoL: Top Esports vs JD Gaming - Game 2 Winner$4.79Aug 2, 13:41 UTC
- TRADESELLLoL: Top Esports vs JD Gaming - Game 2 Winner$290.02Aug 2, 13:41 UTC
- TRADESELLLoL: Top Esports vs JD Gaming - Game 2 Winner$276.50Aug 2, 13:38 UTC
- TRADESELLLoL: Top Esports vs JD Gaming - Game 2 Winner$1.00Aug 2, 13:38 UTC
- TRADESELLLoL: Top Esports vs JD Gaming - Game 2 Winner$462.50Aug 2, 13:38 UTC
- TRADESELLLoL: Top Esports vs JD Gaming - Game 2 Winner$118.48Aug 2, 13:37 UTC
- TRADESELLLoL: Top Esports vs JD Gaming - Game 2 Winner$55.20Aug 2, 13:37 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Wallet edge sanity
Needs review
50/100Useful as a watchlist input, but the edge claim still needs resolved history, cost, and source checks.
Open-position PnL can disappear if liquidity, exit price, or final resolution changes.
Use this wallet as an attention signal only, then verify liquidity and resolution risk.
Required before treating wallet flow as useful
39% win rate over 83 closed markets.
A wallet trade is not useful unless a later follower could still enter after spread, slippage, and latency.
Large positions need enough depth to exit; mark-to-market PnL is not cash.
The trade still needs source, expiry, dispute, and settlement checks at the market level.
Leaderboards surface visible winners; losing or abandoned wallets disappear from attention.
Wallet intelligence filter
Watch only
14/100Wallet flow is useful for attention, but missing/review stages stop it from becoming paper attribution.
46 live trades, 0 ledger trades, copy-risk 62/100.
83 closed markets, 39% win rate.
No market-level spread or simulated execution cost is attached yet.
No source/expiry/dispute risk context is attached yet.
No market liquidity/depth context is attached yet.
No delayed-entry simulation is attached yet.
No paper receipts attribute this wallet signal to later outcomes yet.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 46
- Avg trade size
- $138.14
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Aug 2, 13:28 UTC
- Last active
- Aug 3, 11:08 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 83 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read; copy-risk is inverted so green means lower risk of over-reading the wallet.