Glittering-Disgust
0x904b458f1b46f9da34760ab0f8611127c67da865
Wallet digest
Activity score
76/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
3
Open notional
$34.00
Total PnL
$-0.96
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Switzerland win on 2026-06-18?$31.96Jun 18, 20:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - November 24, 4PM ET$1.54Nov 24, 21:03 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - November 24, 4PM ET$0.46Nov 24, 21:02 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - November 24, 3PM ET$1.00Nov 24, 20:50 UTC
- REDEEMWill Ethereum dip to $2,600 November 17-23?$35.62Nov 24, 20:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Ethereum dip to $2,600 November 17-23?$33.83Nov 18, 19:11 UTC
- REDEEMWill Ethereum dip to $4000 September 8–14?$37.76Sep 30, 19:17 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Ethereum dip to $4000 September 8–14?$32.10Sep 10, 18:24 UTC
- REDEEMWill XRP dip to $2.30 in August?$32.10Sep 10, 18:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill XRP dip to $2.30 in August?$28.38Aug 19, 19:48 UTC
- REDEEMWill Ethereum reach $5000 August 11–17?$28.38Aug 19, 19:40 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Ethereum reach $5000 August 11–17?$17.88Aug 13, 21:52 UTC
- REDEEMWill XRP reach $4.0 in July?$17.88Aug 13, 21:51 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill XRP reach $4.0 in July?$10.38Jul 21, 19:47 UTC
- REDEEMWill XRP dip to $1.7 in June?$10.38Jul 21, 19:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill XRP dip to $1.7 in June?$10.36Jun 29, 21:14 UTC
- REDEEMWill Elon tweet 350–374 times April 11–18?$0.00Jun 26, 20:31 UTC
- REDEEMWill XRP reach $2.80 in May?$12.47Jun 26, 20:31 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill XRP reach $2.80 in May?$12.22May 28, 19:40 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Elon tweet 350–374 times April 11–18?$1.00Apr 15, 20:07 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Wallet edge sanity
Do not mirror
0/100Treat this wallet as noise/context only until resolved history, copy-risk, and liquidity checks improve.
Win rate is hidden until at least 3 closed markets exist for this wallet.
Large size, concentration, or thin history makes this wallet unsafe to imitate.
Required before treating wallet flow as useful
Only 0 closed markets; headline win rate is intentionally hidden.
A wallet trade is not useful unless a later follower could still enter after spread, slippage, and latency.
Large positions need enough depth to exit; mark-to-market PnL is not cash.
The trade still needs source, expiry, dispute, and settlement checks at the market level.
Leaderboards surface visible winners; losing or abandoned wallets disappear from attention.
Wallet intelligence filter
Blocked
0/100Wallet flow is blocked as an intelligence signal until hard failures are fixed.
Wallet activity exists, but copy-risk is too high for interpretation.
Too few closed markets. Do not infer edge from open PnL or leaderboard rank.
No market-level spread or simulated execution cost is attached yet.
No source/expiry/dispute risk context is attached yet.
No market liquidity/depth context is attached yet.
No delayed-entry simulation is attached yet.
No paper receipts attribute this wallet signal to later outcomes yet.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 15
- Avg trade size
- $14.68
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Feb 13, 21:03 UTC
- Last active
- Jun 18, 20:42 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read; copy-risk is inverted so green means lower risk of over-reading the wallet.