Eminent-Moat
0x90fa8fba765a10701fd5d504b44f16d077a77b3f
Wallet digest
Activity score
93/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
2
Open notional
$52.00
Total PnL
$13.14
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Russia capture Kostyantynivka by June 30?$16.02Jun 18, 21:40 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Russia capture Kostyantynivka by June 30?$21.84Jun 18, 21:27 UTC
- REDEEMWill XRP dip to $1.80 November 17-23?$18.03Jun 18, 20:53 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill XRP dip to $1.80 November 17-23?$14.24Nov 21, 19:20 UTC
- REDEEMWill XRP dip to $2.30 in August?$14.24Sep 30, 21:14 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill XRP dip to $2.30 in August?$12.36Aug 19, 19:01 UTC
- REDEEMWill XRP reach $4.0 in July?$12.36Aug 19, 18:55 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill XRP reach $4.0 in July?$7.18Jul 21, 20:02 UTC
- REDEEMWill Elon tweet 255–269 times July 4–11?$7.17Jul 21, 20:00 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Elon tweet 255–269 times July 4–11?$7.16Jul 9, 19:34 UTC
- REDEEMRabby airdrop in Q2 2025?$7.16Jul 9, 19:30 UTC
- TRADEBUYRabby airdrop in Q2 2025?$7.14Jun 29, 21:19 UTC
- REDEEMWill Bitcoin reach $125k in May?$7.15Jun 29, 21:18 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin reach $125k in May?$7.14May 29, 21:39 UTC
- REDEEMWill Elon tweet 350 or more times May 9–16?$7.13May 29, 21:38 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Elon tweet 350 or more times May 9–16?$7.12May 15, 21:44 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Susan Crawford win by 2-4%?$1.00Apr 15, 20:46 UTC
- REDEEMWill XRP reach $3.10 in March?$8.12Apr 15, 20:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill XRP reach $3.10 in March?$8.03Mar 26, 20:46 UTC
- REDEEMWill the market cap of $LIBRA (FDV) be between $1.5b and $2b on Feb 21?$8.03Mar 26, 20:44 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Wallet edge sanity
Do not mirror
0/100Treat this wallet as noise/context only until resolved history, copy-risk, and liquidity checks improve.
Win rate is hidden until at least 3 closed markets exist for this wallet.
Large size, concentration, or thin history makes this wallet unsafe to imitate.
Required before treating wallet flow as useful
Only 0 closed markets; headline win rate is intentionally hidden.
A wallet trade is not useful unless a later follower could still enter after spread, slippage, and latency.
Large positions need enough depth to exit; mark-to-market PnL is not cash.
The trade still needs source, expiry, dispute, and settlement checks at the market level.
Leaderboards surface visible winners; losing or abandoned wallets disappear from attention.
Wallet intelligence filter
Blocked
0/100Wallet flow is blocked as an intelligence signal until hard failures are fixed.
12 live trades, 0 ledger trades, copy-risk 73/100.
Too few closed markets. Do not infer edge from open PnL or leaderboard rank.
No market-level spread or simulated execution cost is attached yet.
No source/expiry/dispute risk context is attached yet.
No market liquidity/depth context is attached yet.
No delayed-entry simulation is attached yet.
No paper receipts attribute this wallet signal to later outcomes yet.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 12
- Avg trade size
- $9.77
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Feb 16, 23:07 UTC
- Last active
- Jun 18, 21:40 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read; copy-risk is inverted so green means lower risk of over-reading the wallet.