Baggy-Enterprise
0x917f6a146e628957ee689924b15318f29d68db5b
Wallet digest
Activity score
49/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
1
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-150.08
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Recent activity
- REDEEMWill Google have the second-best AI model at the end of January 2026?$1.61May 21, 09:11 UTC
- REDEEMWill Anthropic have the second-best AI model at the end of January 2026?$2.06May 21, 09:11 UTC
- REDEEMWill xAI have the second-best AI model at the end of January 2026?$2.83May 21, 09:11 UTC
- REDEEMWill Baidu have the second-best AI model at the end of January 2026?$3.07May 21, 09:11 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill xAI have the second-best AI model at the end of January 2026?$2.80Jan 24, 03:05 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Baidu have the second-best AI model at the end of January 2026?$3.00Jan 24, 03:05 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Anthropic have the second-best AI model at the end of January 2026?$2.00Jan 24, 03:04 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Google have the second-best AI model at the end of January 2026?$1.50Jan 24, 03:04 UTC
- REDEEMWill OpenAI have the best AI model for coding at the end of 2025?$1.16Jan 11, 07:27 UTC
- REDEEMWill Anthropic have the best AI model for coding at the end of 2025?$1.19Jan 11, 07:27 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin more valuable than any company in 2025?$1.19Jan 11, 07:27 UTC
- REDEEMGPT-5 scores ≥ 70% on FrontierMath Benchmark by December 31?$1.22Jan 11, 07:27 UTC
- REDEEMWill Google have the best AI model for coding at the end of 2025?$1.26Jan 11, 07:27 UTC
- REDEEMWill Anthropic have the best AI model for math at the end of 2025?$1.27Jan 11, 07:27 UTC
- REDEEMOpenAI acquired in 2025?$1.38Jan 11, 07:27 UTC
- REDEEMWill xAI have the best AI model for coding at the end of 2025?$1.40Jan 11, 07:27 UTC
- REDEEMWill OpenAI have the best AI model for math at the end of 2025?$1.65Jan 11, 07:27 UTC
- REDEEMWill xAI have the best AI model for math at the end of 2025?$1.71Jan 11, 07:27 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill xAI have the best AI model for math at the end of 2025?$1.70Dec 28, 17:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill OpenAI have the best AI model for math at the end of 2025?$1.64Dec 28, 17:34 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Wallet edge sanity
Do not mirror
3/100Treat this wallet as noise/context only until resolved history, copy-risk, and liquidity checks improve.
Win rate is hidden until at least 3 closed markets exist for this wallet.
Required before treating wallet flow as useful
Only 0 closed markets; headline win rate is intentionally hidden.
A wallet trade is not useful unless a later follower could still enter after spread, slippage, and latency.
Large positions need enough depth to exit; mark-to-market PnL is not cash.
The trade still needs source, expiry, dispute, and settlement checks at the market level.
Leaderboards surface visible winners; losing or abandoned wallets disappear from attention.
Wallet intelligence filter
Blocked
14/100Wallet flow is blocked as an intelligence signal until hard failures are fixed.
23 live trades, 0 ledger trades, copy-risk 48/100.
Too few closed markets. Do not infer edge from open PnL or leaderboard rank.
No market-level spread or simulated execution cost is attached yet.
No source/expiry/dispute risk context is attached yet.
No market liquidity/depth context is attached yet.
No delayed-entry simulation is attached yet.
No paper receipts attribute this wallet signal to later outcomes yet.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 23
- Avg trade size
- $8.09
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Oct 28, 17:31 UTC
- Last active
- May 21, 09:11 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read; copy-risk is inverted so green means lower risk of over-reading the wallet.