Different-Paragraph
0x921350889bd2780b0be47d0c29207ee95fd3f5d2
Wallet digest
Activity score
83/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
1
Open notional
$807.13
Total PnL
$0.16
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill GPT-5.6 be released prior to May 18, 2026?$355.66May 18, 07:07 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill GPT-5.6 be released prior to May 18, 2026?$338.97May 18, 07:06 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill GPT-5.6 be released prior to May 18, 2026?$112.40May 18, 07:06 UTC
- REDEEMWill XRP reach $2.10 May 11-17?$810.00May 18, 06:28 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill XRP reach $2.10 May 11-17?$771.75May 12, 01:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill XRP reach $2.10 May 11-17?$30.68May 12, 01:44 UTC
- REDEEMWill Elon Musk post 165-189 tweets from May 9 to May 11, 2026?$800.80May 11, 18:55 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Elon Musk post 165-189 tweets from May 9 to May 11, 2026?$800.04May 9, 12:12 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 6
- Avg trade size
- $401.58
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 9, 12:12 UTC
- Last active
- May 18, 07:07 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".