Ideal-Waterbed
0x931c0c55f357e468f9a65d6047f393d323c1bf4b
Wallet digest
Activity score
55/100
Performance measurable
Open positions
200
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-4.3K
Realised
$362.69
Win rate
63%
65 closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 200- FAZE
Counter-Strike: FaZe vs TYLOO (BO3) - BLAST Open Rotterdam Group A
400 shares @ 64.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 20, 2026$0.00
$-256.02
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - April 1, 8AM ET
314 shares @ 33.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 1, 2026$0.00
$-105.69
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - April 1, 7PM ET
242 shares @ 30.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 2, 2026$0.00
$-72.63
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - April 1, 3PM ET
207 shares @ 30.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 1, 2026$0.00
$-61.96
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - April 2, 6PM ET
199 shares @ 36.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 2, 2026$0.00
$-73.25
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - April 2, 11AM ET
158 shares @ 35.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 2, 2026$0.00
$-55.97
- FAZE
Counter-Strike: FaZe vs Aurora Gaming (BO3) - BLAST Open Rotterdam Group A
150 shares @ 39.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 18, 2026$0.00
$-59.12
- F5 ESPORTS
Counter-Strike: regain vs F5 Esports (BO3) - ESL Challenger League North America Cup #2 Playoffs
150 shares @ 40.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 21, 2026$0.00
$-61.00
- MOUSQUETAIRES
Counter-Strike: Mousquetaires vs Ursa (BO3) - ESL Challenger League Europe Cup #2 Playoffs
150 shares @ 31.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 22, 2026$0.00
$-47.25
- UNO MILLE
Counter-Strike: UNO MILLE vs Keyd (BO3) - ESL Challenger League South America Cup #2 Playoffs
150 shares @ 28.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 21, 2026$0.00
$-43.00
Recent activity
- MAKER_REBATE$40.15Apr 3, 01:00 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - April 2, 12PM ET$30.00Apr 2, 23:46 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - April 2, 3AM ET$30.00Apr 2, 23:46 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - April 2, 2PM ET$31.25Apr 2, 23:46 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - April 2, 4PM ET$52.39Apr 2, 23:46 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - April 2, 5AM ET$55.37Apr 2, 23:46 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - April 2, 10AM ET$60.88Apr 2, 23:46 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - April 2, 9AM ET$63.00Apr 2, 23:46 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - April 2, 1PM ET$74.50Apr 2, 23:46 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - April 2, 5PM ET$77.27Apr 2, 23:46 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - April 2, 8AM ET$85.99Apr 2, 23:46 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - April 2, 6AM ET$88.64Apr 2, 23:46 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - April 2, 4AM ET$90.00Apr 2, 23:46 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - April 2, 7AM ET$172.53Apr 2, 23:46 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - April 2, 3PM ET$242.88Apr 2, 23:46 UTC
- MERGEBitcoin Up or Down - April 2, 6PM ET$110.29Apr 2, 22:58 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - April 2, 6PM ET$29.40Apr 2, 22:58 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - April 2, 6PM ET$7.70Apr 2, 22:31 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - April 2, 6PM ET$0.49Apr 2, 22:31 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - April 2, 6PM ET$6.96Apr 2, 22:31 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 33
- Avg trade size
- $8.90
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Apr 2, 22:04 UTC
- Last active
- Apr 3, 01:00 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 65 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".