0x934529caf42149f1827010e30dbc98b3d5e4b1b1
0x934529caf42149f1827010e30dbc98b3d5e4b1b1
Wallet digest
Activity score
72/100
Performance measurable
Open positions
27
Open notional
$37.08
Total PnL
$4.81
Realised
$-1.83
Win rate
14%
7 closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 27- NO
Will the highest temperature in Denver be 71°F or below on May 17?
15 shares @ 13.5¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 17, 2026$14.84
$12.84
- YES
Will the highest temperature in Denver be between 72-73°F on May 17?
9 shares @ 11.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 17, 2026$9.09
$8.09
- YES
Will the highest temperature in Miami be between 86-87°F on May 18?
5 shares @ 41.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 18, 2026$4.98
$2.94
- YES
Will the highest temperature in Atlanta be between 88-89°F on May 18?
3 shares @ 30.9¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 18, 2026$2.90
$2.01
- YES
Will the highest temperature in Los Angeles be between 68-69°F on May 17?
3 shares @ 36.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 17, 2026$2.78
$1.78
- YES
Will the highest temperature in San Francisco be 68°F or higher on May 17?
3 shares @ 40.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 17, 2026$2.50
$1.50
- YES
Will the highest temperature in Denver be between 74-75°F on May 17?
243 shares @ 0.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 17, 2026$0.00
$-2.00
- YES
Will the highest temperature in Denver be between 80-81°F on May 17?
203 shares @ 0.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 17, 2026$0.00
$-1.00
- YES
Will the highest temperature in Seattle be between 54-55°F on May 17?
111 shares @ 0.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 17, 2026$0.00
$-1.00
- YES
Will the highest temperature in Denver be between 76-77°F on May 17?
93 shares @ 1.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 17, 2026$0.00
$-1.09
Recent activity
- REDEEMWill the highest temperature in Hong Kong be 25°C on May 16?$0.00May 18, 06:11 UTC
- REDEEMWill the highest temperature in Hong Kong be 25°C on May 16?$0.00May 18, 06:11 UTC
- REDEEMWill the highest temperature in Hong Kong be 29°C or higher on May 15?$0.00May 18, 06:08 UTC
- REDEEMWill the highest temperature in Hong Kong be 29°C or higher on May 15?$0.00May 18, 06:08 UTC
- REDEEMWill the highest temperature in Hong Kong be 24°C on May 16?$0.00May 18, 06:05 UTC
- REDEEMWill the highest temperature in Hong Kong be 24°C on May 16?$0.00May 18, 06:05 UTC
- REDEEMWill the highest temperature in Hong Kong be 24°C on May 15?$0.00May 18, 06:02 UTC
- REDEEMWill the highest temperature in Hong Kong be 24°C on May 15?$0.00May 18, 06:02 UTC
- REDEEMWill the highest temperature in Hong Kong be 25°C on May 15?$0.00May 18, 05:59 UTC
- REDEEMWill the highest temperature in Hong Kong be 25°C on May 15?$0.00May 18, 05:59 UTC
- REDEEMWill the highest temperature in Hong Kong be 23°C on May 16?$0.00May 18, 05:56 UTC
- REDEEMWill the highest temperature in Hong Kong be 23°C on May 16?$0.00May 18, 05:56 UTC
- TRADESELLWill the highest temperature in New York City be between 86-87°F on May 18?$1.20May 18, 02:11 UTC
- TRADESELLWill the highest temperature in Los Angeles be between 68-69°F on May 17?$0.00May 18, 00:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the highest temperature in Seoul be 27°C on May 19?$1.05May 18, 00:23 UTC
- TRADESELLWill the highest temperature in Miami be between 84-85°F on May 18?$0.80May 18, 00:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the highest temperature in Hong Kong be 27°C on May 19?$1.14May 17, 22:46 UTC
- TRADESELLWill the highest temperature in Austin be 88°F or higher on May 17?$1.22May 17, 22:27 UTC
- REDEEMWill the highest temperature in Taipei be 29°C on May 17?$0.00May 17, 22:25 UTC
- REDEEMWill the highest temperature in Taipei be 29°C on May 17?$0.00May 17, 22:25 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Wallet edge sanity
Do not mirror
23/100Treat this wallet as noise/context only until resolved history, copy-risk, and liquidity checks improve.
Closed-market sample is still too small to treat the win rate as durable.
Use this wallet as an attention signal only, then verify liquidity and resolution risk.
Many positions were entered near obvious prices, which can inflate win rate while hiding tail risk.
Required before treating wallet flow as useful
14% win rate over 7 closed markets.
A wallet trade is not useful unless a later follower could still enter after spread, slippage, and latency.
Large positions need enough depth to exit; mark-to-market PnL is not cash.
The trade still needs source, expiry, dispute, and settlement checks at the market level.
Leaderboards surface visible winners; losing or abandoned wallets disappear from attention.
Wallet intelligence filter
Watch only
14/100Wallet flow is useful for attention, but missing/review stages stop it from becoming paper attribution.
19 live trades, 0 ledger trades, copy-risk 52/100.
7 closed markets. Enough to inspect, not enough to trust.
No market-level spread or simulated execution cost is attached yet.
No source/expiry/dispute risk context is attached yet.
No market liquidity/depth context is attached yet.
No delayed-entry simulation is attached yet.
No paper receipts attribute this wallet signal to later outcomes yet.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 19
- Avg trade size
- $0.96
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 17, 18:25 UTC
- Last active
- May 18, 06:11 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 7 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read; copy-risk is inverted so green means lower risk of over-reading the wallet.