Tense-Referendum
0x945e0ff3dc877a8dc83559b758e48580ebc7e95f
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
2
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-157.67
Realised
$0.34
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Recent activity
- REDEEMWill US Catanzaro 1929 win on 2026-05-08?$0.00May 9, 17:48 UTC
- REDEEMWill Racing Club de Lens win on 2026-05-08?$0.00May 9, 17:48 UTC
- REDEEMWill BV Borussia 09 Dortmund win on 2026-05-08?$0.00May 9, 17:48 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Kawkab AC win on 2026-05-08?$0.45May 8, 21:50 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Kawkab AC win on 2026-05-08?$5.04May 8, 20:57 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Levante UD vs. CA Osasuna end in a draw?$0.44May 8, 20:55 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Kawkab AC win on 2026-05-08?$30.23May 8, 20:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Levante UD vs. CA Osasuna end in a draw?$5.07May 8, 20:44 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Torino FC win on 2026-05-08?$39.49May 8, 20:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Torino FC win on 2026-05-08?$34.14May 8, 20:31 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Calcio Padova win on 2026-05-08?$30.28May 8, 20:30 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Cesena FC vs. Calcio Padova end in a draw?$0.93May 8, 20:25 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Cesena FC vs. Calcio Padova end in a draw?$1.58May 8, 20:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Calcio Padova win on 2026-05-08?$20.20May 8, 20:21 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Racing Club de Lens win on 2026-05-08?$4.85May 8, 20:20 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Cesena FC vs. Calcio Padova end in a draw?$17.23May 8, 20:19 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Racing Club de Lens win on 2026-05-08?$10.05May 8, 20:14 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Racing Club de Lens vs. FC Nantes end in a draw?$9.53May 8, 20:13 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Cesena FC vs. Calcio Padova end in a draw?$18.32May 8, 20:07 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Torino FC vs. US Sassuolo Calcio end in a draw?$12.03May 8, 20:04 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Wallet edge sanity
Do not mirror
0/100Treat this wallet as noise/context only until resolved history, copy-risk, and liquidity checks improve.
Win rate is hidden until at least 3 closed markets exist for this wallet.
Required before treating wallet flow as useful
Only 1 closed markets; headline win rate is intentionally hidden.
A wallet trade is not useful unless a later follower could still enter after spread, slippage, and latency.
Large positions need enough depth to exit; mark-to-market PnL is not cash.
The trade still needs source, expiry, dispute, and settlement checks at the market level.
Leaderboards surface visible winners; losing or abandoned wallets disappear from attention.
Wallet intelligence filter
Blocked
14/100Wallet flow is blocked as an intelligence signal until hard failures are fixed.
47 live trades, 0 ledger trades, copy-risk 49/100.
Too few closed markets. Do not infer edge from open PnL or leaderboard rank.
No market-level spread or simulated execution cost is attached yet.
No source/expiry/dispute risk context is attached yet.
No market liquidity/depth context is attached yet.
No delayed-entry simulation is attached yet.
No paper receipts attribute this wallet signal to later outcomes yet.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 47
- Avg trade size
- $14.25
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 8, 09:45 UTC
- Last active
- May 9, 17:48 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 1 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read; copy-risk is inverted so green means lower risk of over-reading the wallet.