Forsaken-Carving
0x9923f8973b8e4d5f41afd69e7861019ca30951a9
Wallet digest
Activity score
55/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
2
Open notional
$11.05
Total PnL
$-2.95
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Recent activity
- REDEEMWTT - Men's Singles: South Korea vs Slovakia$1.31May 7, 09:47 UTC
- REDEEMWTT - Men's Singles: Germany vs Slovenia$1.01May 7, 09:47 UTC
- TRADESELLTrump out as President by June 30?$2.05May 7, 09:44 UTC
- TRADEBUYWTT - Men's Singles: Germany vs Slovenia$1.00May 4, 19:41 UTC
- TRADEBUYWTT - Men's Singles: South Korea vs Slovakia$1.30May 4, 19:24 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Tiger Woods play in a PGA Tournament in 2026?$9.03May 4, 18:43 UTC
- TRADEBUYTrump out as President by June 30?$2.00Mar 30, 19:32 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Troels Lund Poulsen be the next prime minister of Denmark after the 2026 parliamentary elections?$5.00Mar 30, 19:30 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 6
- Avg trade size
- $3.40
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Mar 30, 19:30 UTC
- Last active
- May 7, 09:47 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".